Video Performance

Now that we've discussed how the HTC 10 does on still images we can go over how well it does for video recording. There have been a lot of cases where a smartphone can take great images but the video quality is often appalling and pretty much an afterthrought. In order to try and see how the HTC 10 does we can start by looking at the kind of encode settings that the HTC 10 uses.

HTC 10 Video Encode Settings
  Video Audio
1080p30 20 Mbps H.264 Baseline 192 Kbps, 48 KHz AAC
24 bit, 96 KHz FLAC
4K30 56 Mbps H.264 High Profile 192 Kbps, 48 KHz AAC
24 bit, 96 KHz FLAC
720p120 24 Mbps H.264 Baseline 192 Kbps, 48 KHz AAC

Right off the bat things are a little concerning here. For some reason HTC is using AVC Baseline for encode in 1080p30 and 1080p60 is absent altogether. I'm not sure why this is but really neither of those things should be the case. 720p120 also uses AVC Baseline which really shouldn't be the case. Interestingly enough, HTC has also included the ability to record video with FLAC audio which results in an mkv file output instead of an mp4 but as far as I can tell nothing else seems to change as far as video encode settings go.

1080p30 Video

In 1080p30 video HTC manages to pull off an interesting trick, which is that their video is actually properly stabilized instead of whatever is going on with the Galaxy S7 and G5. I would say that the color is also a little more accurate from what I saw at the time of recording but without a proper ColorChecker chart I can't really prove this assertion. At this point the HTC 10 and OnePlus 3 both have strange issues with artifacting around the sky that makes me wonder whether the Snapdragon 820 has some sort of issue with the encode blocks leading to such poor quality. Audio quality with FLAC is just clearly superior here though.

4K30 Video

In 4K30 the HTC 10 unfortunately loses the software stabilization so the result is basically just as shaky as the Galaxy S7 and by extension the Note7. Even using AVC High profile I can still see strange artifacts in the sky which is really strange. Audio capture continues to be better as far as suppressing wind noise goes than Galaxy S7, likely due to the use of dual level microphones similar to what we saw in the One M7. I would say color rendition is more accurate here as well but this is a subjective observation. The iPhones 6s continues to be one of the best phones for 4K30 capture almost entirely because it actually has the ISP throughput to process 4K video properly.

Slow Motion Video

In 720p120 the HTC 10 really starts to show its weakness. I suspect we're dealing with some kind of sensor limitation here because 4K30 is possible but for some reason 720p240 isn't. Color rendition is mildly cooler here as well relative to the Galaxy S7 but detail isn't great here and obviously it isn't going to be able to capture motion as well as anything with 240 FPS capture. The iPhone 6s would obviously beat it here by virtue of its 1080p120 capture.

Overall, video capture is somewhat disappointing on the HTC 10. It definitely isn't unusable and the FLAC audio is a compelling addition along with proper 1080p30 video stabilization, but things like poor slow motion capture and some strange artifacting and poor encode profiles mar the experience. Relative to something like the Galaxy S7 I would say that 1080p30 and 4K30 capture are clearly superior, but 720p120 and the utter lack of 1080p60 video means that depending upon what you use the camera for the HTC 10 can end up falling short of the competition. 720p240, 1080p60 for next year as well as AVC High Profile across the board would be great to see and would resolve a lot of the issues here.

Looking at the camera overall, I think the HTC 10 is very much the equal of the Galaxy S7 as far as camera goes. The Galaxy S7 and Note7 have incredible user experience due to the sheer speed of capture and focus, but the image quality, oil painting-esque processing, and somewhat off color rendition in a lot of cases means that the HTC 10 can give you a better result if you can tap to focus properly and possibly adjust the exposure metering. It definitely could use some work to clean up the details and loose ends, but HTC has finally shipped a camera that they can be proud of and lives up to the promise of the marketing and specs.

Still Image Performance Software UX: HTC Sense
Comments Locked

183 Comments

View All Comments

  • Badelhas - Tuesday, September 20, 2016 - link

    My experience with HTC has been great, including the HTC Vive. Do you have any HTC product to support your theory?
  • JeffFlanagan - Tuesday, September 20, 2016 - link

    If you've dealt with Vive support, you already know what I'm talking about. It's no secret that their support is hopeless.
  • ACM.1899 - Monday, September 19, 2016 - link

    tnx for the review . great Job. impressed with the Camera. how about audio quality? although we know it's great. so there is no DAC? i've heard (read) there is.
    in android phones , i guess HTC 10 is the best as long as you don't like One+3 or a Nexus (Pixel).
    specially Nexus devices that somehow are at the beginning of their era , compared to HTC's that i think are at the end.
  • Haldi - Monday, September 19, 2016 - link

    Qualcomm Aqstic
  • ACM.1899 - Monday, September 19, 2016 - link

    and by end i meant : not much left to achieve... ;)
  • zepi - Monday, September 19, 2016 - link

    Nice review.

    What should I make of the that HTC wifi performance figure? Your graph shows that it still has some throughput at well under -80dBm signals when other phones stop much earlier?

    Then in the test you mention signal strengths are about 5dB worse than with S7. Should I read this that in the end, all phones lose connectivity at roughly same location?
  • WoodyPWX - Monday, September 19, 2016 - link

    Where are the OnePlus 3 in the results for a comparison? That phone actually kills HTC 10. Is that a coincidence?
  • Lau_Tech - Monday, September 19, 2016 - link

    Hi Josh, thank you. I enjoyed this review greatly and learnt much from it. I bought the HTC 10 in May and through my own informal testing I can confirm the majority of your findings regarding the build quality, camera, WIFI performance, U.I and even display contrast (however, my screen does not have the "pink" off angle issue though, possibly because it is a Sharp-manufactured panel).

    One area which the HTC 10 is a stand-out (and possibly still worth due consideration even at this juncture) is in its internal audio performance. I understand that Anandtech lacks the equipment to test this objectively but I can confirm that the HTC 10 is within a select group of smartphones that audiophiles can consider. (the others being the LG V10,V20, Iphone 6s,7 and possibly the ZTE axion 7.)

    From your review I infer that this has become your new daily driver. Coming from a One Plus One, I do agree the rock-solid reliability of the Sense U.I is a big differentiator. The HTC 10 really is a phone that ages well, and the software updates do quite alot to address the obvious issues that crop up. in version 1.90 the option for 16second shutter delay was also added, I wonder what are your thoughts on this? For me it seems largely unusable without a tripod.

    Once again, thanks for getting this out, and for taking the 'badgering' in your stride. Having read and watched every review of the HTC 10 on the web I can say without qualification that this one is by far the best. Well done!
  • Lau_Tech - Monday, September 19, 2016 - link

    https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/MobileComm/M.1462332737.A.C...

    A taiwanese side-by-side of the two panels. I must say the Sharp Panel does seem more subjectively appealing.
  • ACM.1899 - Monday, September 19, 2016 - link

    couldn't agree more

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now