​Content creators in the field often have to deal with large amounts of data spread over multiple flash media. Importing them into a computer for further processing has always been a challenge. Casual users can connect the cameras directly to a PC, while some might prefer taking the card out and using a card reader for this purpose. There are a multiple options available in the card reader market. However, professionals who value cutting down the media import time need to opt for readers with a USB 3.0 and/or Thunderbolt interface. Lexar has a range of card readers and a 4-bay hub (the Lexar Professional Workflow HR2) to go with them. In this review, we take a look at the hub in action. The process also allows us to create a framework for reviewing flash-based storage media for non-PC applications.


Lexar is a division of Micron Technology, and caters to the consumer memory market. Their product lines include memory cards, USB flash drives, card readers, and external SSDs. The main target market is content creators who work primarily in the field. As digital photography took hold, two main memory card formats gained prominence - CompactFlash and SD. However, as bandwidth requirements increased with the advent of high-resolution video, other memory card formats such as CFast and XQD are also getting a toehold in the market.

​Lexar's approach to the card reader market is very interesting. Most of their readers come in a standard size and have an appropriately located USB 3.0 Type-B female port in the rear. The hub we are reviewing today (HR2) has four slots into which these readers can be inserted. The slots have a USB 3.0 Type-B male port inside, allowing four different readers to be linked to a single backplane. The CFast 2.0 reader is a bit different, though. In addition to the USB 3.0 port that allows it to communicate through the hub, it also sports a Thunderbolt 2 port. However, the Thunderbolt port is not used when the reader is accessed via the hub.

The Lexar Professional Workflow HR2 is sold as a pure 4-bay hub and does not come with any readers (or, cards - but, that is obvious). For the purpose of our review, the following Lexar Professional components were used:

  1. Workflow HR2 4-bay Thunderbolt 2 / USB 3.0 Hub
  2. Workflow CR2 CFast 2.0 Thunderbolt / USB 3.0 Reader
  3. Workflow SR2 SDHC / SDXC UHS-II USB 3.0 Reader
  4. Workflow CFR1 CompactFlash UDMA 7.0 USB 3.0 Reader
  5. Workflow XR2 XQD 2.0 USB 3.0 Reader
  6. 3600x CFast 2.0 128GB Card
  7. 1800x microSDXC UHS-II U3 Class 10 128GB Card
  8. 1000x SDXC UHS-II U3 Class 10 128GB Card
  9. 2933x XQD 2.0 128GB Card
  10. 1066x CompactFlash UDMA 7 128GB Card

The readers and cards allowed us to put the hub to extensive use and also helped in developing a framework for performance evaluation of the cards.

The Workflow HR2 package comes with the main unit, a Thunderbolt 2 cable, a USB 3.0 Type-B male to Type-A female cable, and a 60W adapter (12V @ 5A) along with adapter plugs for various locales.

On the rear, we have a USB 3.0 Type-B female port and the power adapter inlet. There are two Thunderbolt 2 ports, allowing the hub to be part of a daisy-chain configuration. The bays are protected by faceplates that are easy to take out, as shown in the gallery below. The card readers come with the appropriate cables and also a dust cover.

The readers can be used standalone, and are bus-powered. Note that the CFast 2.0 reader's Thunderbolt interface is utilized only when it is used standalone, and not as part of the hub. The hub acts as a USB 3.0 to USB 3.0 / Thunderbolt bridge, while supporting various other Thunderbolt features. The bandwidth part, unfortunately, is restricted to what the USB 3.0 interface can support - an issue for some of the CFast 2.0 cards that claim read speeds of 540 MBps.

Evaluation Methodology
Comments Locked


View All Comments

  • romrunning - Thursday, June 22, 2017 - link

    It would be a nicer product if it supported Thunderbolt 3.
  • romrunning - Thursday, June 22, 2017 - link

    ... and while we're at it, USB 3.1 Gen2. That would make it a more usable hub for me.
  • ganeshts - Thursday, June 22, 2017 - link

    Definitely.. but, as I mentioned in the concluding section, we are reviewing a product that is almost 3 years old now :) (it is in our review table for an additional reason - allowing us to evaluate memory cards from different vendors). The next iteration should bring about USB 3.1 Gen 2 (which should be more than good enough bandwidth-wise) and / or Thunderbolt 3 (which should enable daisy-chaining with other equipment)
  • Morawka - Thursday, June 22, 2017 - link

    adds costs and the speed is not needed unless your flashing to a RAID 5 Array of SSD's
  • Samus - Thursday, June 22, 2017 - link

    Wow, I didn't even know something like XQD existed. That's a pretty badass format (PCIe) considering it dates back to 2010.
  • Grammar polic3 - Friday, June 23, 2017 - link

    "There product lines include memory cards, USB flash drives, card readers, and external SSDs."
    You should have started the sentence with "their".
  • ganeshts - Friday, June 23, 2017 - link

    Unpardonable mistake. Not sure how that sneaked into the piece. I have changed it.
  • Wolfpup - Friday, June 23, 2017 - link

    The...I don't know what you call them, but the readers that can plug in to the dock also work on their own. I've been using an SD card one on it's own for several years, use it to use an SC card to sync some stuff between work and home, and the setup works great.
  • cfenton - Sunday, June 25, 2017 - link

    I like seeing SD card reviews.

    Just a few typos/errors to point out:

    1. On the 1000x SDXC page it says "From write speeds of aroun 100 MBps, we drop down to 16 MBps."

    2. The graphs in the PCMark 8 section of the CFast page seem to be flipped around. It shows that the card has much faster write speeds than read speeds, while all the other charts on the page show the opposite.
  • jonny13 - Tuesday, June 27, 2017 - link

    Funny how this review comes out before Micron takes the ax to Lexar and shuts down the product line, which sucks as I had gone to all Lexar products in my cameras as they are much more reliable and faster than Sandisk.

    RIP Lexar


Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now