Test Bed and Setup

As per our testing policy, we take a high-end CPU suitable for the motherboard that was released during the socket’s initial launch and equip the system with a suitable amount of memory running at the processor maximum supported frequency. This is also typically run at JEDEC subtimings where possible. It is noted that some users are not keen on this policy, stating that sometimes the maximum supported frequency is quite low, or faster memory is available at a similar price, or that the JEDEC speeds can be prohibitive for performance. While these comments make sense, ultimately very few users apply memory profiles (either XMP or other) as they require interaction with the BIOS, and most users will fall back on JEDEC supported speeds - this includes home users as well as industry who might want to shave off a cent or two from the cost or stay within the margins set by the manufacturer. Where possible, we will extend our testing to include faster memory modules either at the same time as the review or a later date.

Readers of our motherboard review section will have noted the trend in modern motherboards to implement a form of MultiCore Enhancement / Acceleration / Turbo (read our report here) on their motherboards. This does several things, including better benchmark results at stock settings (not entirely needed if overclocking is an end-user goal) at the expense of heat and temperature. It also gives, in essence, an automatic overclock which may be against what the user wants. Our testing methodology is ‘out-of-the-box’, with the latest public BIOS installed and XMP enabled, and thus subject to the whims of this feature. It is ultimately up to the motherboard manufacturer to take this risk – and manufacturers taking risks in the setup is something they do on every product (think C-state settings, USB priority, DPC Latency/monitoring priority, overriding memory sub-timings at JEDEC). Processor speed change is part of that risk, and ultimately if no overclocking is planned, some motherboards will affect how fast that shiny new processor goes and can be an important factor in the system build.

Test Setup
Processor Intel i9 7900X (10C/20T, 3.3G, 140W)
Motherboard ASRock Fatal1ty X299 Professional Gaming i9
Cooling Corsair H115i
Power Supply Corsair HX750
Memory Corsair Vengeance LPX 4x8GB DDR4 2666 CL16
Corsair Vengeance LPX 4x4GB DDR4 3200 CL16 (OC)
Memory Settings DDR4 2666 CL16-18-18-35 2T
Video Cards ASUS Strix GTX 980
Hard Drive Crucial MX300 1TB
Optical Drive TSST TS-H653G
Case Open Test Bed
Operating System Windows 10 Pro 64-bit

 

Many thanks to...

We must thank the following companies for kindly providing hardware for our multiple test beds. Some of this hardware is not in this test bed specifically but is used in other testing.

Thank you to ASUS for providing us with GTX 980 Strix GPUs. At the time of release, the STRIX brand from ASUS was aimed at silent running, or to use the marketing term: '0dB Silent Gaming'. This enables the card to disable the fans when the GPU is dealing with low loads well within temperature specifications. These cards equip the GTX 980 silicon with ASUS' Direct CU II cooler and 10-phase digital VRMs, aimed at high-efficiency conversion. Along with the card, ASUS bundles GPU Tweak software for overclocking and streaming assistance.

The GTX 980 uses NVIDIA's GM204 silicon die, built upon their Maxwell architecture. This die is 5.2 billion transistors for a die size of 298 mm2, built on TMSC's 28nm process. A GTX 980 uses the full GM204 core, with 2048 CUDA Cores and 64 ROPs with a 256-bit memory bus to GDDR5. The official power rating for the GTX 980 is 165W.

The ASUS GTX 980 Strix 4GB (or the full name of STRIX-GTX980-DC2OC-4GD5) runs a reasonable overclock over a reference GTX 980 card, with frequencies in the range of 1178-1279 MHz. The memory runs at stock, in this case, 7010 MHz. Video outputs include three DisplayPort connectors, one HDMI 2.0 connector, and a DVI-I.

Further Reading: AnandTech's NVIDIA GTX 980 Review

 

Thank you to Crucial for providing us with MX300 SSDs. Crucial stepped up to the plate as our benchmark list grows larger with newer benchmarks and titles, and the 1TB MX300 units are strong performers. Based on Marvell's 88SS1074 controller and using Micron's 384Gbit 32-layer 3D TLC NAND, these are 7mm high, 2.5-inch drives rated for 92K random read IOPS and 530/510 MB/s sequential read and write speeds.

The 1TB models we are using here support TCG Opal 2.0 and IEEE-1667 (eDrive) encryption and have a 360TB rated endurance with a three-year warranty.

Further Reading: AnandTech's Crucial MX300 (750 GB) Review

 

Thank you to Corsair for providing us with Vengeance LPX DDR4 Memory, HX750 Power Supply, and H115i CPU Cooler

Corsair kindly sent a 4x8GB DDR4 2666 set of their Vengeance LPX low profile, high-performance memory for our stock testing. The heatsink is made of pure aluminum to help remove heat from the sticks and has an eight-layer PCB. The heatsink is a low profile design to help fit in spaces where there may not be room for a tall heat spreader; think a SFF case or using a large heatsink. Timings on this specific set come in at 16-18-18-35. The Vengeance LPX line supports XMP 2.0 profiles for easily setting the speed and timings. It also comes with a limited lifetime warranty. 

Powering the test system is Corsair's HX750 Power Supply. This HX750 is a dual mode unit able to switch from a single 12V rail (62.5A/750W) to a five rail CPU (40A max ea.), and is also fully modular. It has a typical selection of connectors, including dual EPS 4+4 pin four PCIe connectors and a whopping 16 SATA power leads, as well as four 4-pin molex connectors.

The 135mm fluid dynamic bearing fan remains off until it is 40% loaded offering complete silence in light work loads. The HX750 comes with a ten-year warranty. 

In order to cool these high-TDP HEDT CPUs, Corsair sent over its latest and largest AIO in the H115i. This closed loop system uses a 280mm radiator with 2x140mm SP140L PWM controlled fans. The pump/block combination mounts to all modern CPU sockets. Users are also able to integrate this cooler into the Corsair link software via USB for more control and options. 

BIOS and Software Benchmark Overview
Comments Locked

22 Comments

View All Comments

  • jardows2 - Tuesday, September 26, 2017 - link

    I took the comment differently than you. I took it as being surprised that they didn't include a Killer NIC, not that the reviewer was disappointed in any way. It seems to be the standard practice of MB makers to give their "gaming" boards a more "awesomeness" by including the "much superior because of such a cool name" Killer NIC. Just a little bit surprised that AsRock didn't do it on this one.
  • notR1CH - Wednesday, September 27, 2017 - link

    Killer NICs are all software based too (except the very first proof of concept one with the ridiculous heatsink). Their software and drivers are trash compared to well established vendors like Intel. I actively avoid any motherboards integrating their hardware and I'm very surprised to see Anandtech in favor of them.
  • BrokenCrayons - Tuesday, September 26, 2017 - link

    "Curiously, for a motherboard which has "gaming" in the title and having three network ports, we were surprised not to see a Killer Network based NIC which finds its way on to several other gaming motherboards."

    I don't think that Killer NICs are a selling point these days. Rivet has a well-deserved, awful reputation for hocking what amounts to ethernet snake oil. Numerous times, I've seen people state that they will not purchase a particular product because a Killer NIC is present. ASRock probably made a good decision by omitting rather than including one.
  • Flunk - Tuesday, September 26, 2017 - link

    You hit the rivet on the head there, most gamers don't want Killer Nics because of the poor software support and total lack of any advantage in performance. They'd rather have an Intel NIC that is rock solid.
  • apoctwist - Wednesday, September 27, 2017 - link

    Yeah. I have an ASRock X99X mobo and when I tried to use the Killer NIC my cpu usage was sitting at close to 60% on idle because the stupid software kept doing something. Luckily ASRock included a Intel NIC, moved to that and never looked back. I will never buy a mobo that has Killer NICs, period. So I'm glad ASRock is getting rid of that junk. Even more interesting is ASRock including Intel NICs on AMD's platform.
  • samer1970 - Tuesday, September 26, 2017 - link

    X299 +i9 is as stupid choice . people who choose 10+ cores want ECC support. and the new Turbo is more than enough for speed.

    people who want to overclock those cpu will go for the cheapest coming 6 cores i7 8700K ..

    I dont know why intel is shooting itself in the foot .. intel enable ECC for i9 .. this needs no brain at all to figure out. unless your iq is zero
  • ddriver - Tuesday, September 26, 2017 - link

    Intel was thinking about milking idiots.

    According to intel shills ECC is so unimportant, that intel feels the need to charge a 50% premium for an identical product that doesn't have ECC disabled.

    But let's be honest, games need 10+ core products as much as they need ECC - not at all.

    HEDT for gaming is simply idiocy. It is a waste. Intel's HEDT lineup however seems to be designed with one purpose in mind - milking idiots out of their money. So it all makes sense in a sad, sad way.

    Do not be fooled by the high price, this is not a product for professionals, this is an expensive toy for losers with poor self esteem who need it to cultivate an illusion that it somehow makes up for their lack of redeeming qualities, even if all it does in reality is further prove their idiocy. Product value is not all that bad around 6-8 cores, albeit IO is abysmal, and of course, the lack of ECC support. But everything on top of that outta come with a certificate for idiocy, and for the 16 and 18 core versions, it should come in a massive, big frame too.
  • apoctwist - Wednesday, September 27, 2017 - link

    No need for a certificate or frame. You can spot one of these idiots a mile away. They'll be covered in LEDs.
  • samer1970 - Wednesday, September 27, 2017 - link

    LOL ...

    True , Sadly all case manufacturers are going RGB led design to the point that I must get an older case each time I make a PC.

    Tempered Glass and LED ... people forgot how important it is to shield their PC and the RGB is just for kids.

    I miss already good designed PC cases ...
  • peevee - Wednesday, September 27, 2017 - link

    "Professional Gaming"

    Up next: your mom's basement becomes "Professional Office".

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now