A low-cost alternative for Ryzen systems to the high-calibre but higher-cost motherboards is the B350 range. Today we are testing the ASRock AB350 Gaming K4 motherboard, coming in under the radar just below $90. It offers almost everything its bigger cousins provide except SLI, but single GPU users can find a home with a motherboard like this one. Our aim today is to ascertain whether the ASRock AB350 Gaming K4 can be a top value proposition with the B350 chipset in play.

Other AnandTech Reviews for AMD’s Ryzen CPUs and X370/B350

The AMD Ryzen 3 1300X and Ryzen 3 1200 CPU Review: Zen on a Budget
The AMD Ryzen 5 1600X vs Core i5 Review: All Ryzen 5 CPUs Tested
The AMD Zen and Ryzen 7 Review: A Deep Dive on 1800X, 1700X and 1700

To read specifically about the X370/B350 chip/platform and the specifications therein, our deep dive into what it is can be found at this link.

Planned Reviews

  • $260 - ASRock X370 Professional Gaming
  • $230 - ASRock X370 Taichi
  • $175 - GIGABYTE AX370-Gaming 5 [review]
  • $160 - ASRock X370 Gaming-ITX/ac
  • $110 - Biostar X370GTN [review]
  • $98 - MSI B350 Tomahawk [review]
  • $90 - ASRock B350 Gaming K4 [this review]

The ASRock AB350 Gaming K4 Overview

Most of the world who own desktop computers typically have something very simple. A mid-range CPU, no overclock, a discrete graphics card, one or two storage devices, a modest memory, and a mouse/keyboard. Everyone likes to talk about the halo, but the reality is that the bigger battlefield is in the lower ranks. To that end, both major players offer non-overclockable mid-range CPUs, and also mid-range chipsets for motherboards that target a lower cost segment. A few of the extra features might be reduced, such as high-end USB ports, storage options, or SLI, but the benefit for the simpler system is lower cost, especially when in these markets, cost is a big factor in gaining market share. So alongside AMD's high end X370 is the more mid-range B350 and A320 chipsets, showing an awesome PC for most people doesn't have to empty the bank account.  

With the ASRock AB350 Gaming K4, as the name seems to imply, ASRock wants it two ways: a competitive gaming motherboard in the B350 chipset space. No idea why it is called the 'AB350', that's just something ASRock seems to do, but the goal of the board here is to target the gaming crowd. That means having a relatively fully black PCB, a set of red aluminium heatsinks, and a full-length PCIe slot for graphics that has extra reinforcement to take the toughest pixel pushing PCIe powerhouses. The top full-length slot runs in PCIe x16 mode from the CPU, while the second slot also from the CPU, but is limited to PCIe x4, and shares bandwidth with one of the M.2 slots.

Focusing on the storage, a total of six SATA 6Gb/s ports are present with four of them are angled at 90 degrees at the bottom right hand side of the board. The remaining two are straight angled and can be found towards the integrated USB 3.0 front panel header (at the foot of the four RAM slots); these two ports are powered through an ASMedia ASM1061 controller. The AB350 Gaming K4 has two M.2 slots, with the top one above the reinforced PCIe x16 Gen3 slot coming from the CPU, sharing PCIe lanes with the second full-length PCIe slot, while the second M.2 slot is a SATA-only slot. It's a shame that they both aren't PCIe, but still there are not many sub-$100 motherboards that will happily take two M.2 storage drives as easily.

The AB350 Gaming K4 does favour some of the more budget focused controllers, which which is to be expected on a sub $100 offering, but this means the onboard audio usese the Realtek RTL8111 networking chip and the Realtek ALC892 audio codec, often bundled at a discount for OEMs. The audio solution is reinforced by ELNA audio capacitors, as well as some degree of PCB separation to ensure there is no interference between the analog and digital signals in close proximity. Despite the chipset supporting USB 3.1 (10 Gbps), ASRock saves some effort in the mode complicated traces by relying on USB 3.0 instead - with five Type-A ports on the rear, a Type-C port on the rear enabled by an ASMedia ASM1543 redriver, and a single USB 3.0 header. Everything else is USB 2.0.

Despite this board, at this price point, is not exactly feature rich as shown by having only the four 4-pin fan headers. That being said, the dedicated CPU fan header does have support for a maximum power rating of 1A/12V, allowing for high-powered fans or pumps, and the other three fan headers are capable of automatically detecting if PWM or DC fans are connected.

Price wise, the ASRock AB350 Gaming K4 currently retails for a modest $90. This technically makes it one of the most expensive B350 motherboards on the market, however the value proposition is when comparing it to its more expensive X370 brethren. For the majority of gamers, such as those that do not need SLI support, the Gaming K4 has a lot to offer by shaving off some of those top tier items, but also comes bundled with ASRock's gaming software and capabilities. In the benchmarks, it draws close parity to its more expensive cousins, and even passes a good overclock. Why spend $250 on features the user might not need, when with a $90 motherboard the system can still offer a hefty punch - especially if that gets reinvested in a better GPU. 

Overclocking with a Ryzen 7 1700

Usually cheaper motherboards could lead to a variety of overclocking issues. For example, the power delivery could use cheaper components, resulting in a lower overall efficiency. This would empty more thermal energy into the heatsinks, and if the heatsinks are also similarly less performant due to cost, it compounts the issue. If the motherboard has fewer PCB layers, designers often have to make compromises on trace layout, which can also reduce potential peak frequencies.

Luckily, on the AB350 Gaming K4, overclocking was as easy as any of the X370 motherboards we have tested. The UEFI BIOS is very intuitive to use, and is one of my favourites so far out of all of the B350 based motherboards we have tested. One could quite easily forget that this isn’t actually an X370 motherboard in terms of performance, style, design and colour scheme. 


Our standard overclocking methodology is as follows. We select the automatic overclock options and test for stability with POV-Ray and OCCT to simulate high-end workloads. These stability tests aim to catch any immediate causes for memory or CPU errors.

For manual overclocks, based on the information gathered from previous testing, starts off at a nominal voltage and CPU multiplier, and the multiplier is increased until the stability tests are failed. The CPU voltage is increased gradually until the stability tests are passed, and the process repeated until the motherboard reduces the multiplier automatically (due to safety protocol) or the CPU temperature reaches a stupidly high level (100ºC+). Our test bed is not in a case, which should push overclocks higher with fresher (cooler) air.

Overclocking Results

From our previous testing, our Ryzen 7 1700 CPU has a limitation between 3.9 GHz and 4.0 GHz. Despite the hub-bub over 4 GHz and above Ryzen chips, while 3.9GHz seems meagre, in the full spectrum of the silicon lottery it is actually reasonable for a Ryzen 7 1700 chip. Even at 3.9 GHz, the performance is consistent within our testing perameters, with the chip pushing close to 190 W at the wall under OCCT.

POV-Ray @ 3.9GHz

Power OCCT (w/GTX 980) - Overclocking

The Ryzen 7 1700 processor we are currently using has a 3.0 GHz base core clock with a turbo clock speed of 3.7 GHz, and has an on-the-box TDP of 65W. When overclocked to 3.9 GHz with 1.375 volts, the overall power consumption taken at the wall was pushing just under 189W at peak, but it sailed through our testing.

Board Features And Visual Inspection


View All Comments

  • Topweasel - Monday, April 9, 2018 - link

    This isn't one of those "Delay'ed reviews". It's practically already in a retirement home. It's well over a year since this chipset launched. I was wondering since there had been a decent amount of Z370 and X299 reviews, I was left wondering where the AMD board reviews are, but not this, I mean we are less than a week for a new chipset on the platform with new CPU's, specially for such a milquetoast selection. Reply
  • IBM760XL - Monday, April 9, 2018 - link

    It's worth noting in the specs box on page two that there are the additional two SATA ports mentioned elsewhere above the base B350. That's one of the main reasons I'm considering this board.

    Although at this point, I'm going to wait for the next-gen to launch next week.
  • npz - Monday, April 9, 2018 - link

    I guess it's alright. Just another in a sea of premium low-end chipset boards.

    The dual m.2 would've been a great differentiator but in reality the dual m.2 is pretty gimmicky. If the top m.2 shares lanes with the pcie x4 slot at the bottom that means it's mutially exclusive and using one disables the other. Likewise with what's mentioned in the article about the bottom m.2 slot sharing lanes with SATA. You end up disabling SATA ports because of that. I suppose real dual m.2 would require an expensive pcie switch which wouldn't make sense on this board.

    It's also too bad they cheapened out on the USB 3.1 that the chipset provides
  • DanNeely - Tuesday, April 10, 2018 - link

    Some degree of lane sharing between PCIE slots and sata ports with m.2 ports is happening on almost all current gen full ATX boards for both AMD and Intel because (excluding threadripper with only 2 16x slots instead of the more common 3) there aren't enough total PCIe lanes available and for SATA it's cheaper to share between a port and m.2 slot than to make 2 variants of each board one wired the first way and the other the second even ignoring that both of those boards would fall one step behind in feature counts and ignores people who'd like to keep both options open to either connect an additional HDD or sata m.2 at some point in the future if they unexpectedly needed to. Reply
  • DanNeely - Tuesday, April 10, 2018 - link

    PCIe switches have been gone on anything but the most expensive boards for several years now. The only company making them was bought up by someone who decided there was more money to be made raising the price for an x8 to x16 from $40 to $100 to soak server vendors at the cost of almost completely abandoning the enthusiast consumer market as a result. Reply
  • notashill - Wednesday, April 11, 2018 - link

    I think anyone who actually needs to use more than two m.2 drives and three hard drives simultaneously can afford an X370 board. Reply
  • Death666Angel - Wednesday, April 18, 2018 - link

    The problem is that the mATX variant of this board, the ASRock AB350M Pro4, is the only mATX AM4 motherboard I could find with two M.2 slots. All other B350 and X370 mATX boards only have one M.2 slot. The X399M Taichi TR4 mATX board has 3 M.2 slots, so it is possible to get more. I don't mind the second port being SATA too much, since there aren't too many PCIe lanes to go around. Although a PCIe Gen 2 M.2 slot would have added a bit of performance. But that would definitely be a niche market. For peole wondering why I would need such a configuration: it's mostly to reduce clutter inside my case. Gum stick SSDs are much neater than 2.5" ones with their cables. Reply
  • dromoxen - Wednesday, April 11, 2018 - link

    both major players offer non-overclockable mid-range CPUs?? i WAS under the impression that ALL ryzens were o/c able .. Not all mid range chipsex offer overclocking tho ab320 Reply
  • hammerang - Wednesday, April 11, 2018 - link

    Sorry but shouln't a proper gaming motherboard test include mobo components thermal data with and without OC? Reply
  • hammerang - Wednesday, April 11, 2018 - link

    Regarding the ALC892, i so budget i gonna buy an additional pcie sound card for another $80. Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now