CPU Performance, Short Form

For our motherboard reviews, we use our short form testing method. These tests usually focus on if a motherboard is using MultiCore Turbo (the feature used to have maximum turbo on at all times, giving a frequency advantage), or if there are slight gains to be had from tweaking the firmware. We leave the BIOS settings at default and memory at JEDEC for the supported frequency of the processor for these tests, making it very easy to see which motherboards have MCT enabled by default.

Rendering - Blender 2.78: link

For a render that has been around for what seems like ages, Blender is still a highly popular tool. We managed to wrap up a standard workload into the February 5 nightly build of Blender and measure the time it takes to render the first frame of the scene. Being one of the bigger open source tools out there, it means both AMD and Intel work actively to help improve the codebase, for better or for worse on their own/each other's microarchitecture.

Rendering: Blender 2.78

The Z370-I Gaming completed the Blender benchmark in 304 seconds. This result places right among the others, just behind the Apex leading the way. The range of results spans a bit over 2% from the fastest to slowest. 

Rendering – POV-Ray 3.7: link

The Persistence of Vision Ray Tracer, or POV-Ray, is a freeware package for as the name suggests, ray tracing. It is a pure renderer, rather than modeling software, but the latest beta version contains a handy benchmark for stressing all processing threads on a platform. We have been using this test in motherboard reviews to test memory stability at various CPU speeds to good effect – if it passes the test, the IMC in the CPU is stable for a given CPU speed. As a CPU test, it runs for approximately 1-2 minutes on high-end platforms.

Rendering: POV-Ray 3.7

POV-Ray results show the Mini-ITX board right in the middle of this thread heavy benchmark. All boards ran the benchmark at the same clock speed of 4.3 GHz. This particular group of results is very tight with less than 1% difference. 

Compression – WinRAR 5.4: link

Our WinRAR test from 2013 is updated to the latest version of WinRAR at the start of 2014. We compress a set of 2867 files across 320 folders totaling 1.52 GB in size – 95% of these files are small typical website files, and the rest (90% of the size) are small 30-second 720p videos.

Encoding: WinRAR 5.40

The WinRAR results show our smaller little board completing this test in 41.5 seconds. This result is slowest in a very tightly knit group. All clock speeds were the same during this testing with the results within a margin of error again. 

Synthetic – 7-Zip 9.2: link

As an open source compression tool, 7-Zip is a popular tool for making sets of files easier to handle and transfer. The software offers up its own benchmark, to which we report the result.

Encoding: 7-Zip

The 7-Zip results have the Z370-I Gaming scoring 38884. We end up with yet another result mixing in with others we have so far. 

Point Calculations – 3D Movement Algorithm Test: link

3DPM is a self-penned benchmark, taking basic 3D movement algorithms used in Brownian Motion simulations and testing them for speed. High floating point performance, MHz, and IPC win in the single thread version, whereas the multithread version has to handle the threads and loves more cores. For a brief explanation of the platform agnostic coding behind this benchmark, see my forum post here.

System: 3D Particle Movement v2.1

In 3DPM21, The Z370-I Gaming reached 1838 Mop/s. The scores of all Z370 and i7-8700K testing were within 60 points (around 3%) of each other. The CPUs all ran the same speeds in this test, so again we see a margin of error size differences between our datasets so far. 

Neuron Simulation - DigiCortex v1.20: link

The newest benchmark in our suite is DigiCortex, a simulation of biologically plausible neural network circuits, and simulates activity of neurons and synapses. DigiCortex relies heavily on a mix of DRAM speed and computational throughput, indicating that systems which apply memory profiles properly should benefit and those that play fast and loose with overclocking settings might get some extra speed up. Results are taken during the steady state period in a 32k neuron simulation and represented as a function of the ability to simulate in real time (1.000x equals real-time).

System: DigiCortex 1.20 (32k Neuron, 1.8B Synapse)

The DigiCortex results have the Z370-I Gaming with a result of 0.97. DigiCortex does show a bigger spread between results which is different than we have seen previously, however the results align with WinRAR which is also a more memory limited test.

System Performance Gaming Performance
Comments Locked

37 Comments

View All Comments

  • Ian Cutress - Monday, May 21, 2018 - link

    Correct; updated.
  • hansmuff - Monday, May 21, 2018 - link

    A DisplayPort connector! Yay! Too many Mini-ITX have been skipping those, including some ASUS boards.
  • ಬುಲ್ವಿಂಕಲ್ ಜೆ ಮೂಸ್ - Monday, May 21, 2018 - link


    "it is worth nothing that the Type-C connector isn't USB 3.1 (10 Gbps)"
    -------------------------
    It must be worth something or why even have it?
    LOL
  • Mr Perfect - Monday, May 21, 2018 - link

    What are the BIOS defaults like?

    We've got a couple older Z170 Asus Maximus VIII Impact machines around, and for some reason the BIOS defaults to all non-standard values. If you want to run things at stock/standard you have to specifically change them to be that. It's especially annoying because BIOS updates reset all of your settings to Asus' defaults.

    Asus has some nice hardware, but I really don't feel like fighting them on BIOS defaults.
  • nimi - Tuesday, May 22, 2018 - link

    What do you mean by non-standard values? Did you accidentally load a overclocking profile or something?
  • 12345 - Tuesday, May 29, 2018 - link

    It's very common for intel motherboards to set very high voltages for stuff like system agent. This very board will auto set vccio and vccsa to like 1.2-1.3v when the bios itself describes default as like .96v
  • nimi - Tuesday, May 22, 2018 - link

    You forgot to edit the copy/pasted lineup table on the first page, it claims this review is for the Maximus X Apex with the Z370-I Gaming "in testing".
  • AnnoyedGrunt - Tuesday, May 22, 2018 - link

    I've been very intrigued by the mini-ITX format for a new build. I'd be doing an AMD version, but from what I can see, if you aren't going to do SLI, the mini-ITX boards offer a great value. You get intel networking, intel wi-fi, Realtek 1220 sound, NVME storage slots, all in a small package with a reasonable cost.

    ATX boards with those features tend to be quite a bit more expensive, especially on the AMD side (or you sacrifice some of the features).

    Of course, once you load up a build with an ATX PSU, large cooler, GPU, ODD (I still buy CD's and need a way to rip them) the size starts to be similar to a regular ATX build. Still, I like the minimalist approach to the motherboard.

    -AG
  • imaheadcase - Tuesday, May 22, 2018 - link

    You pointed out exact reason why not to get this, so this board should be used in most builds no problem. Its really nice simply to have a small case as well.
  • creed3020 - Tuesday, May 22, 2018 - link

    Error in the table at the bottom of page 1. The note [this review] is in the wrong row. Looks like a C&P error from the previous review of the ROG mITX board.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now