NVIDIA's GeForce 6600GT AGP: The Little Bridge that Could
by Anand Lal Shimpi on November 16, 2004 12:15 PM EST- Posted in
- GPUs
Head to Head: ATI Radeon 9800 Pro vs. NVIDIA GeForce 6600GT
Before we get to the full set of benchmarks we wanted to look at a couple of important direct comparisons to the 6600GT.
First we have ATI's Radeon 9800 Pro; using our RealTime Price Engine we see that the 128MB ATI Radeon 9800 Pro is currently selling for $214
Under Doom 3, the 6600GT performs at a minimum of 27% faster than the 9800 Pro at the lowest resolution we tested. Ramping up in resolution only widened the gap between the cards. The 6600GT remains playable all the way through our testing, while the 9800 Pro falls to less than half the 6600GT's frame rate at our highest resolution. Not only is this generation's midrange card outperforming a top of the line card from last year, but technologically and dollar for dollar this 6600GT is the very clear winner here as well.
Doom 3 Performance |
|||
|
ATI Radeon 9800 Pro |
NVIDIA GeForce 6600GT |
Performance Advantage |
640 x 480 |
82.9 |
105.9 |
27.7% |
800 x 600 |
63.9 |
100.3 |
57.0% |
1024 x 768 |
45.1 |
82 |
81.8% |
1280 x 1024 |
30.5 |
58.7 |
92.5% |
1600 x 1200 |
21 |
43.4 |
106.7% |
Winner |
- |
- |
6600GT |
The CS: Source VST also shows an increasing performance advantage with resolution. In two of the most demanding apps, the 6600GT is able to scale much better than its competition at this price point. These numbers are not as dramatic as the Doom 3 scores, but at the same time, NVIDIA cards have traditionally been stronger under OpenGL titles while ATI cards tend to hold there own when put to the DirectX test. Of course, this fact just amplifies the victory for the 6600GT.
Counterstrike: Source Visual Stress Test Performance |
|||
|
ATI Radeon 9800 Pro |
NVIDIA GeForce 6600GT |
Performance Advantage |
640 x 480 |
185.3 |
191.8 |
3.5% |
800 x 600 |
153.1 |
175.3 |
14.5% |
1024 x 768 |
103.3 |
133.3 |
29.0% |
1280 x 1024 |
65.8 |
83.3 |
26.6% |
1600 x 1200 |
51.2 |
68 |
32.8% |
Winner |
- |
- |
6600GT |
The two contenders traded blows in this DirectX 8.1 based game. The numbers are close across the board. The 6600GT leads at lower resolutions, while the 9800 Pro inks ahead above 1280. None of these numbers are hugely significant, and this game is a classic toss up. The engine is tried and true as it's based on the same technology used in UT2K3. It doesn't really push the hardware like other games we see on the list, but it is still a good test because many games licensed the Unreal Engine.
Unreal Tournament 2004 |
|||
|
ATI Radeon 9800 Pro |
NVIDIA GeForce 6600GT |
Performance Advantage |
640 x 480 |
69.9 |
72.3 |
3.4% |
800 x 600 |
69.3 |
71.4 |
3.0% |
1024 x 768 |
68.4 |
70.5 |
3.1% |
1280 x 1024 |
64.2 |
62.8 |
2.2% |
1600 x 1200 |
51.1 |
50.2 |
1.8% |
Winner |
- |
- |
Tie |
With the exception of UT2K4, Far Cry revives a trend: the 6600GT increases its lead in the benchmark as we increase the resolution. Far Cry didn't show as much favor toward the 6600GT as in Doom 3 or the Source VST, but the trend is still the same. While the 20% lead the 6600GT maintains at 1600x1200 is impressive, 37 fps may or may not be playable depending on how demanding of a gamer one may be. We like to see 40 to 45 fps in shooters at a minimum, but there is a subjective element to it, and we'll leave the final call to the reader.
Far Cry 1.3 Performance |
|||
|
ATI Radeon 9800 Pro |
NVIDIA GeForce 6600GT |
Performance Advantage |
640 x 480 |
88.8 |
86.3 |
2.8% |
800 x 600 |
77.7 |
80.8 |
4.0% |
1024 x 768 |
62.2 |
67.9 |
9.2% |
1280 x 1024 |
44.3 |
48.7 |
9.9% |
1600 x 1200 |
30.9 |
37.1 |
20.1% |
Winner |
- |
- |
6600GT |
Another DirectX 9.0 game shows that the 6600GT card has a resolution scaling advantage over the 9800 Pro that gives it much more bang for the buck. Halo's performance advantage numbers fall somewhere between Doom 3's and the Source VST's. Between the 9800 Pro and the 6600GT, current and future games will definitely see more benefit from the NVIDIA card.
Halo 1.05 Performance |
|||
|
ATI Radeon 9800 Pro |
NVIDIA GeForce 6600GT |
Performance Advantage |
640 x 480 |
119.4 |
131.7 |
10.3% |
800 x 600 |
88.9 |
111.7 |
25.6% |
1024 x 768 |
60.9 |
82.4 |
35.3% |
1280 x 1024 |
39.8 |
56.9 |
43.0% |
1600 x 1200 |
27.7 |
41.3 |
49.1% |
Winner |
- |
- |
6600GT |
In this older OpenGL title, we see the 9800 Pro scale better than the 6600GT, but the NVIDIA card still maintained a lead throughout the testing. Since the smallest advantage the 6600GT enjoyed was just under 3% at 1600x1200, this benchmark goes to in its favor. With OpenGL being NVIDIA's strong suit, and the 6600GT doing so well in al the other benchmarks, it is interesting that this would be the game in which the 9800 Pro would give some of its best competition. Of course, the fact that this game is based on a very fixed function type of engine could have something to do with that.
Wolfenstein: |
|||
|
ATI Radeon 9800 Pro |
NVIDIA GeForce 6600GT |
Performance Advantage |
640 x 480 |
101.4 |
107.6 |
6.1% |
800 x 600 |
100.8 |
107.5 |
6.6% |
1024 x 768 |
99.6 |
104.2 |
4.6% |
1280 x 1024 |
85.1 |
88 |
3.4% |
1600 x 1200 |
66.2 |
68 |
2.7% |
Winner |
- |
- |
6600GT |
ATI's 9800 Pro scales down better than the 6600GT here, but the NVIDIA card just outperforms the 9800 hands down.
Battlefield - |
|||
|
ATI Radeon 9800 Pro |
NVIDIA GeForce 6600GT |
Performance Advantage |
640 x 480 |
134 |
217 |
61.9% |
800 x 600 |
115 |
180 |
56.5% |
1024 x 768 |
93 |
134 |
44.1% |
1280 x 1024 |
73 |
97 |
32.9% |
1600 x 1200 |
53 |
68 |
28.3% |
Winner |
- |
- |
6600GT |
Once again, we see the 6600GT out performing and out scaling the 98000 Pro. This game isn't built for sheer frame rate, but, at the same time, the graphics can be intensive.
The Sims 2 Performance |
|||
|
ATI Radeon 9800 Pro |
NVIDIA GeForce 6600GT |
Performance Advantage |
800 x 600 |
48.7 |
50.3 |
3.3% |
1024 x 768 |
38.7 |
42.1 |
8.8% |
1280 x 1024 |
30.5 |
32.6 |
6.9% |
1600 x 1200 |
22.8 |
27.8 |
21.9% |
Winner |
- |
- |
6600GT |
Across the board, the 6600GT is a better buy than the 9800 Pro. There is no question that the performance is better across the board, and only gets better at higher resolutions. Add to that the fact that the feature set is a year newer, and there really isn't a debate.
66 Comments
View All Comments
Avalon - Tuesday, November 16, 2004 - link
Thank you for taking our concerns into consideration, Anand :)coldpower27 - Tuesday, November 16, 2004 - link
That's intresting, how the 6800 GT dips like that in Sims 2 performance at 12x10, do you have any reason why? Even stranger still how the X800 Pro seems to be actually beating the 6800 GT in this particular game in high res. However it's FPS seems to be limited to 40FPS max across the board :S. Also could you possibly bench the Sims 2 under 1152x864, I would like to see what the performance of the 6800 GT is at that res for this game.Oh good review, would like a 300/700 6800 LE 8x1/4 and 325/700 6800 Vanilla 12x1/5 tested as well. To see how those compare to these cards,
ciwell - Tuesday, November 16, 2004 - link
Hmm...try to get the BFG OC one then...:D :D
Anand Lal Shimpi - Tuesday, November 16, 2004 - link
Thanks for the comments. We did not have a vanilla 6800 available for testing for this review, but as soon as we get one in we will make sure to include it in our upcoming reviews.Take care,
Anand
ciwell - Tuesday, November 16, 2004 - link
Yeah, I am wondering where the vanilla 6800 is too? It clearly is in direct competition with the 6600GT.ciwell - Tuesday, November 16, 2004 - link
CU - Tuesday, November 16, 2004 - link
I would also like to know why the 6800nu is not included. The message may not be so clear if the 6800nu was included.9700prolover - Tuesday, November 16, 2004 - link
I love the last sentense. Even the writer of anandtech loves the "the message is clear, xxx wins/fails" style of conclusion.Avalon - Tuesday, November 16, 2004 - link
Where was the vanilla 6800? You can get a BFG 6800 OC at Outpost for $249.99, and it's in stock at this moment. I recall the 6800 beating the 6600GT in 60% of benchmarks, while losing out in 40% of benchmarks. If the 6600GT is going to cost $225, that won't be much fun. I'd rather take the BFG 6800 and unlock the pipes and vertex shaders, artifact permitting.Decoder - Tuesday, November 16, 2004 - link
What about the video decoding issues on the NVidia chips? Has that been resolved?http://techreport.com/ja.zz?comments=7535