Samsung Announces Note 20 & Note 20 Ultra: Better S-Pen, New Finishesby Andrei Frumusanu on August 5, 2020 11:30 AM EST
- Posted in
- Galaxy Note20
- Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Today Samsung is announcing the much-awaited new Galaxy Note20 and Galaxy Note20 Ultra via its Unpacked August 2020 live stream event. Much like in 2019, Samsung is continuing to offer two variants of the Note series flagship devices, only that this time around the bigger and more feature-rich variants adopts the “Ultra” denomination, with no “+” variant this year. Unlike the Note10 series, this also means that the new Note20 series are also more significantly differing in their specifications, as Samsung is adopting the same differing camera system approaches as on the S20 series, with the Note20 Ultra offering a higher-end camera system compared to the regular Note20.
Naturally, the area where the Note series differentiates itself the most from the S-series is the fact that the phones come with the S-Pen stylus that allows you to write and control the phone with.
|Samsung Note 20 Series|
|Galaxy Note20||Galaxy Note20 Ultra|
|SoC||(North America, China, Korea, Japan)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
1x Cortex-A77 @ 3.0GHz
3x Cortex-A77 @ 2.42GHz
4x Cortex-A55 @ 1.80GHz
Adreno 640 @ ?MHz
|(Europe & Rest of World)
Samsung Exynos 990
2x Exynos M5 @ 2.73GHz
2x Cortex-A76 @ 2.50GHz
4x Cortex-A55 @ 2.00GHz
Mali G77MP11 @ 800 MHz
2400 x 1080 (20:9)
3088 x 1440 (19.3:9)
|Dimensions||161.6 x 75.2 x 8.3mm
192g (sub-6 & LTE)
|164.8 x 77.2 x 8.1mm
|RAM||8GB LPDDR5||12GB (5G) LPDDR5
8GB (LTE) LPDDR5
|5G = 128/256GB
LTE = 256GB
|5G = 128/256/512GB
LTE = 256 or 512GB
|Battery||4300mAh (16.64Wh) typ.
4170mAh (16.13Wh) rated
|4500mAh (17.41Wh) typ.
4370mAh (16.91Wh) rated
|15W Wireless Charging|
Super Fast Charging
|Front Camera||10MP 1.22µm
4K video recording
|Primary Rear Camera||79° Wide Angle
12MP 1.8µm Dual Pixel PDAF
|79° Wide Angle
108MP 0.8µm DP-PDAF
3x3 Pixel Binning to 12MP
8K24 Video Recording
Laser AF module
|fixed f/1.8 optics
OIS, auto HDR, LED flash
4K60, 1080p240, 720p960 high-speed recording
|76° Wide Angle
(Cropping / digital zooming telephoto)
F/2.0 optics, OIS
8K24 Video Recording
(5x optical magnification)
F/3.0 prism optics, OIS
|120° Ultra-Wide Angle
12MP 1.4µm f/2.2
|4G / 5G
|Snapdragon 5G - Snapdragon Modem X55 (Discrete)
(LTE Category 24/22)
DL = 2500 Mbps - 7x20MHz CA, 1024-QAM
UL = 316 Mbps 3x20MHz CA, 256-QAM
(5G NR Sub-6 + mmWave*)
DL = 7000 Mbps
UL = 3000 Mbps
*Depending on region and model
|Exynos 5G - Exynos Modem 5123 (Discrete)
(LTE Category 24/22)
DL = 3000 Mbps 8x20MHz CA 1024-QAM
UL = 422 Mbps ?x20MHz CA, 256-QAM
(5G NR Sub-6)
DL = 5100 Mbps
|Exynos 4G - Exynos Modem 5213 (Discrete)
(LTE Category 20/7)
DL = 2000 Mbps 8x20MHz CA 1024-QAM
UL = 200 Mbps ?x20MHz CA, 256-QAM
|SIM Size||NanoSIM + eSIM|
|Wireless||802.11a/b/g/n/ac/ax 2x2 MU-MIMO,
BT 5.0 LE, NFC, GPS/Glonass/Galileo/BDS
no 3.5mm headset
|Special Features||Under-screen ultrasonic fingerprint sensor|
|(Qualcomm QC 2.0, Adaptive Fast Charging, USB-PD 3.0 PPS),
reverse wireless charging (WPC & PMA),
IP68 water resistance
|Launch OS||Android 10 with Samsung OneUI 2.0|
|Launch Prices||256GB 4G:
n/a / 959€ / £849
$999 / 1059€ / £949
$1299 / 1309€ / £1179
$1449 / 1409€ / £1279
Starting off with the hardware of the two new devices, in terms of SoC it looks like Samsung is using a newer Snapdragon 865+ SoC – although it’s not quite exactly the specifications that Qualcomm has advertised a few weeks ago. The one difference is that instead of Qualcomm’s advertised 3.1GHz, the new chip here clocks in at a lower 3.0GHz. It’s possible that Samsung opted to lower the frequency to maintain better efficiency or power consumption metrics. We don’t yet know if Samsung has made any changes to the GPU frequencies and whether it showcases the 865+’s full +10% performance boost.
Naturally, Samsung is still continuing to dual-source SoCs, and European and other global users in non-Snapdragon markets get the S.LSI Exynos 990 that we found in the Galaxy S20 series. It’s odd to see the Snapdragon variant receiving a small SoC bump while the Exynos variant remains the same, but it’s unfortunately just the reality of the situation of Samsung’s hardware strategy. Whilst the Exynos 990 isn’t bad this year, it’s notably lagging behind the Snapdragon variant both in performance and efficiency.
In terms of memory, all the Note20 Ultra will be offered with 12GB of LPDDR5 for it’s 5G variant, while the 4G Note20 Ultra and the regular Note20 will come with 8GB of memory.
In terms of storage, the Note20 is offered in 128 or 256GB, although oddly enough the 128GB variant only is available in the 5G model of the phone. The Note20 Ultra also shares this oddity, with an extra 512GB configuration option for both 5G and LTE models.
Big Screen Differences
Last year, the Note10 series was a bit controversial due to the fact that the regular Note10 came with an only 1080p display, which had been a downgrade from the usual 1440p resolution that Samsung employs in its flagships.
This year, Samsung made an even more inexplicable hardware choice when choosing the Note20 display characteristics: It’s still a 6.7” 2400 x 1080 resolution AMOLED screen again, but what’s really odd is that it doesn’t feature any high refresh rate capabilities at all, skipping on one of the new main feature additions of 2020 devices.
The display is also using a flat-style design – this isn’t the more flatted curve design as found on the S20 and S20+, but rather a fully flat screen. Whilst this is a subjective design choice, I can’t help but feel that the Note20 here is more akin to a Note20 Lite due to its lacklustre specifications on the display side of things.
The Galaxy Note20 Ultra is more full-featured, and here we see the expected 120Hz 6.9” 3088 x 1440 AMOLED display, sharing feature parity with the S20 series devices. We don’t know yet if Samsung now offers full QHD rendering resolution at 120Hz or if the phone is still only limited to FHD when choosing the higher refresh rate.
Improved S-Pen Latency
What’s present on both Note20 series and a massive improvement in user experience, is the new S-Pen’s input latency. Samsung was able to reduce the input to photon latency down to a mere 9ms which gives a much-improved writing experience, as input latency is an extremely critical aspect of such input methods. Samsung says they’re using machine learning input prediction as part of the techniques used to achieve this improvement, which is a great use of AI in a phone.
The Note20 Ultra remains a slightly bigger device, although it doesn’t change much compared to the Note10+ beyond a weight increase from 196g to 208g. The Note20 however has greatly increased its footprint compared to the Note10, growing from a 72mm wide device to a 75.2mm width, meaning it’s a notable form-factor change in terms of ergonomics. Weight has also greatly increased from 168g to 194g. Most of the weight increase has been the greatly increased battery capacity to a 4300mAh (up from 3500) battery. The Note20 Ultra had a smaller battery boost from 4300mAh to 4500mAh.
New Colours and Finish
Samsung is adding a slew of new colours, of which they claim the new “Mystic Bronze” is now the highlight of the series. Beyond black and white options for the Ultra, we see a lighter black and a silver variant for the regular Note20.
What’s actually the biggest change in the new phones isn’t the colours themselves, but the finish of the material. For the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, Samsung is now for the first time employing a chemically etched frosted matte glass back cover. This had been something that I really felt was missing from the S20 series devices so I’m super happy to see Samsung finally jumping on this bandwagon, allowing for fingerprint smudges on your phones.
The Note20 also adopts a matte finish, however Samsung here doesn’t use chemically etched glass, but rather uses a layer of polycarbonate on top of the glass. Whilst this might give a good feel and also gets rid of fingerprints, I wonder how this material will hold up against scratches and whether the phone will be more scratch-prone than a regular glass back.
On the topic of scratch resistance, the new phones now feature Corning’s newest Gorilla Glass Victus on the front displays.
Cameras - Matching the S20's except for a different periscope
On the camera side of things, the Note20 series don’t bring too many new features to the table. The Note20 features the same camera setup that we find on the S20 and S20+, meaning a 12MP 1.4µm f/1.8 main wide camera, a 64MP 0.8µm f/2.0 secondary wide-angle camera, and a 12MP 1.4µm f/2.2 ultra-wide-angle unit. I found this camera combination to be extremely solid and probably the best solution in 2020.
The Note20 Ultra adopts the same 108MP 0.8µm f/1.8 camera sensor as on the S20 Ultra, but one addition here is that Samsung is adding in a laser autofocus module to augment and solve some of the issues this sensor has had in the S20 Ultra due to its lack of DP-PDAF.
Another big change the Note20 Ultra makes is the abandonment of the 48MP sensor in its zoom periscope module. This has now been replaced with a 12MP 1.0µm sensor which is much smaller in size. The optics here have grown from a 4x to a 5x optical magnification, and the aperture is bigger at f/3.0 compared to the f/3.5 unit on the S20 Ultra. Generally, the main advantage of this change is that Samsung probably saved a lot of space internally as the new module should be much smaller in size, maybe why they were able to reduce the camera bump footprint. Secondly, it allows for simplified, and maybe higher quality optics. Their advertising has also ditched the failed 100x zoom label on the camera housing – and the phone only magnifies to up to 50x now.
Pricing & Availability:
The Galaxy Note20 will come in at $999 / 1059€ / £949 for the 5G 256GB variant in the US and Europe. The Note 20 Ultra starts at $1299 / 1309€ / £1179, with an extra $150 or 100€/£ for the 512GB variant.
Pre-orders start today/tomorrow, with availability of the phones starting August 21st.
Overall, both devices are relatively disappointing to me. Whilst the Note20 Ultra checks off all the checkboxes in terms of features, its extremely high price isn’t justifiable and suffers the same value issues as the S20 Ultra. The Note20’s worse display is a big disappointment and not competitive with other 2020 flagships, so again Samsung’s price positioning here is a tad too greedy given this big drawback.
Post Your CommentPlease log in or sign up to comment.
View All Comments
Quantumz0d - Thursday, August 6, 2020 - linkHey, if you want to turn a blind eye on how the marketing and HR dept in these corporations work, I cannot help you at all. Esp in California it's a big thing go and read on SB826. Realize who is a blind idiot gulping down all the koolaid junk. And the proof is in the pudding, go and watch the Android 10 demos and all the marketing, and look who is in charge.
PeachNCream - Friday, August 7, 2020 - linkIf you've ever had to pay the so-called pink tax, you'll get it. Like women's jeans are so. much. more. expensive, never fit right (its even worse ordering them without trying them on thanks to shopping in person being something that you do now at risk of dying from infection), and have the worst, most useless pockets ever! Anyhow, women pay more for stuff in general, represent a larger share of the population by a small percentage, and have not historically been targeted by advertising efforts in the past. The change in marketing direction is good, buuuuuuut I'll admit I can understand that it might make some men feel alienated at the same time which is not at all the intent, I would think. Companies like Samsung just want to be able to charge a pink tax on their phones to nudge profit margins up a little further so they are appealing to the other demographic half.
Spunjji - Friday, August 7, 2020 - linkI'm gonna go out on a limb and infer that when you say I'm "turn[ing] a blind eye to how the marketing and HR departments in these corporations work", you're referring to some sort of "Postmodern Neo-Marxism" crap? Regardless, you definitely a habit of making wildly off-base judgements about other people's abilities and motivations based on insufficient evidence, because I'm pretty familiar with how they work and pretty certain that has fuck-all to do with Scoped Storage.
In these circumstances I wonder why people like you never seemed keen to establish any causal links between the numerous historical missteps of major tech corporations and the fact that until recently they all measurably favoured middle-class white men over everyone else. Of course, now that they've begun the process of *not doing that anymore*, you're all grabbing your bells and sandwich-boards and proclaiming all ills to be the fault of your chosen scapegoats.
Such rational, so logic, wow.
Quantumz0d - Friday, August 7, 2020 - link"of major tech corporations and the fact that until recently they all measurably favoured middle-class white men over everyone else" - Fantastic IQ display, go back from where you crawled. Twitter ? Reesetera ?
The Garden Variety - Monday, August 10, 2020 - link(standing ovation)
TheinsanegamerN - Thursday, August 6, 2020 - linkReally wish firefox hadnt dumped firefox OS nad has instead maintained it for use on android phones.
Quantumz0d - Thursday, August 6, 2020 - linkFirefox doesn't even care about their userbase even after Quantum. It was supposed to get back the people back on board after they kicked off XUL based UI changeable extensions/add-ons. But if you look at how crappy they are becoming esp with the URL bar and all the bloatware they add with opt-out and the new CEO of the project, Michelle Baker, she shat on the guy who was Mozilla's CEO, Gerv prior to her and now they even have add-ons like the one below in recommended, This is a milquetoast approach from me, FireFox is not the old project anymore, they also supported the latest politically correct nonsense rioting in U.S.
That company is rotting away...the marketshare is dropping like a rock and they are pursuiing bs like VPNs and other paid nonsense while blowing all the money out to the unions and other trash.
It's sad on how this company is changing, and Google also funds them heavily, so they inject a lot of Chrome changes into them even when the user base do not want or even remotely accept like the URL bar changes, etc.
Quantumz0d - Thursday, August 6, 2020 - linkhttps://twitter.com/BrendanEich/status/12175177039...
^Marketshare to compensation
Shat campaign - https://blog.lizardwrangler.com/2018/08/07/in-memo...
PeachNCream - Saturday, August 8, 2020 - linkChrome is terrible too though. There are two different class action lawsuits against Chrome. One is for when it continues to collect data while running in incognito mode and another for data collection when a user doesn't provide Google credentials and permission to collect data. It's pretty private stuff to like history and session cookies.
There is at least one other class action open against Google over illegal wiretap abuses for always on tracking against the consent of users. Basically Google saying it doesn't collect data means it is still collecting data from people that don't consent. Trusting Google at this point is hard to do if they're already lying to everyone by saying they aren't gathering and storing information about someone when they really are.
As for your feelings about women and social causes, I'm not going to address those. It seems too emotionally charged to bother talking about.
Quantumz0d - Saturday, August 8, 2020 - linkI don't use Chrome / Chromium at all, it holds monopoly and I stopped using it because of the drastic changes in UX hiding information from URL bars, certs and other stuff along with exe scans etc, plus that enigne they use, meaning all Chromium projects.