GPU Performance - Gaming Workloads

The Beast Canyon NUC's gaming prowess was evaluated using our 2018 gaming test suite (to ensure we have a good set of comparison points from our previous reviews):

  • Civlization VI (DX12)
  • Dota 2
  • F1 2017
  • Grand Theft Auto V
  • Middle Earth: Shadow of War
  • Far Cry 5

Most system reviews take a handful of games and process them at one resolution / quality settings for comparison purposes. Recently, we have seen many pre-built systems coming out with varying gaming capabilities. Hence, it has become imperative to give consumers an idea of how a given system performs over a range of resolutions and quality settings for each game. With our latest suite, we are able to address this aspect.

Civilization VI (DX12)

The Civilization series of turn-based strategy games is very popular. For such games, the frame rate is not necessarily an important factor in the gaming experience. However, with Civilization VI, Firaxis has cranked up the visual fidelity to make the game more attractive. As a result, the game can be taxing on the GPU as well as the CPU, particularly in the DirectX 12 mode.

Civilization VI (DirectX 12) Performance

We processed the built-in benchmark at two different resolutions (1080p and 2160p), and with two different quality settings (medium and ultra, with the exact differences detailed here). All settings and resolutions point to the Beast Canyon being the runaway winner. It is the CPU capabilities that probably edge the scores here, given that the RTX 3060 and RTX 2070 perform quite similar to each other in most of the other workloads.

Dota 2

Dota 2 has been featuring in our mini-PC and notebook reviews for a few years now, but, it still continues to be a very relevant game. Our evaluation was limited to a custom replay file at 1080p resolution with enthusiast settings ('best-looking' preset). We have now revamped our testing to include multiple resolutions - This brings out the fact that the game is CPU-limited in many configurations.

Dota 2 allows for multiple renderers - we use the DirectX 11 mode. The rendering settings are set to 'enthusiast level' (best-looking, which has all options turned on, and at Ultra level, except for the Shadow Quality set to 'High'). We cycle through different resolutions after setting the monitor resolution to match the desired resolution. The core scripts and replay files are sourced from Jonathan Liebig's original Dota 2 benchmarking instructions which used a sequence of frames from Match 3061101068.

Dota 2 - Enthusiast Quality Performance

Dota 2 is not a taxing benchmark for these high-end systems, and the Beast Canyon is either comfortably on top, or within the margin of error when things are too close to call.

F1 2017

Our gaming system reviews have always had a representative racing game in it. While our previous benchmark suite for PCs featured Dirt 2, we have moved on to the more recent F1 2017 from Codemasters for our revamp.

F1 2017 - Ultra Quality Performance

The supplied example benchmark (with some minor tweaks) is processed at four different resolutions while maintaining the graphics settings at the built-in 'Ultra' level. The trend observed in previous games holds true here also, with the Beast Canyon emerging on top.

Grand Theft Auto V

GTA doesn’t provide graphical presets, but opens up the options to users and extends the boundaries by pushing even the hardest systems to the limit using Rockstar’s Advanced Game Engine under DirectX 11. Whether the user is flying high in the mountains with long draw distances or dealing with assorted trash in the city, when cranked up to maximum it creates stunning visuals but hard work for both the CPU and the GPU. For our test we have scripted a version of the in-game benchmark. The in-game benchmark consists of five scenarios: four short panning shots with varying lighting and weather effects, and a fifth action sequence that lasts around 90 seconds. We use only the final part of the benchmark, which combines a flight scene in a jet followed by an inner city drive-by through several intersections followed by ramming a tanker that explodes, causing other cars to explode as well. This is a mix of distance rendering followed by a detailed near-rendering action sequence.

Grand Theft Auto V Performance

We processed the benchmark across various resolutions and quality settings (detailed here). The results are presented above.Except for the 4KMax setting where the Ghost Canyon takes the lead, it is the Beast Canyon outperforming all other systems here.

Middle Earth: Shadow of War

Middle Earth: Shadow of War is an action RPG. In our previous gaming benchmarks suite, we used its prequel - Shadow of Mordor. Produced by Monolith and using the new LithTech Firebird engine and numerous detail add-ons, Shadow of War goes for detail and complexity. The graphics settings include standard options such as Graphical Quality, Lighting, Mesh, Motion Blur, Shadow Quality, Textures, Vegetation Range, Depth of Field, Transparency and Tessellation. There are standard presets as well. The game also includes a 'Dynamic Resolution' option that automatically alters graphics quality to hit a pre-set frame rate. We benchmarked the game at four different resolutions - 4K, 1440p, 1080p, and 720p. Two standard presets - Ultra and Medium - were used at each resolution after turning off the dynamic resolution option.

Middle Earth: Shadow of War Performance

The Ghost Canyon NUC and the Beast Canyon NUC perform very similarly at higher resolutions in this benchmark. Both outperform the other systems handily across the board, though.

Far Cry 5

Ubisoft's Far Cry 5 is an action-adventure first-person shooter game released in March 2018. The game comes with an in-built benchmark and has standard pre-sets for quality settings. We benchmarked the game at four different resolutions - 720p, 1080p, 1440p, and 2160p. Two preset quality settings were processed at each resolution - normal and ultra.

Far Cry 5 Performance

Similar to the other games, the RTX 3060 combined with the Tiger Lake-H CPU help the Beast Canyon come out on top across all resolutions and quality settings.

Overall, the Tiger Lake-H CPU's capabilities complement the prowess of the GeForce RTX 3060 nicely to provide a gameplay experience better than previous generation systems. As we shall see later on, this is at a lower price point while maintaining similar power consumption levels.

Miscellaneous Performance Metrics Power Consumption and Thermal Performance
Comments Locked

84 Comments

View All Comments

  • Spunjji - Friday, July 30, 2021 - link

    The original "Next Unit of Computing" was specifically meant to be an extremely small (below ITX sized) system that was significantly smaller than could be assembled by an end-user from off-the-shelf parts - not just an "SFF desktop".

    Kaby G was a stretch, but it was still as small as you could get for the power. As notashill noted this one is way, way past that goal. They're free to dilute their branding if they want to, but that's absolutely what they're doing here.
  • Tams80 - Sunday, August 8, 2021 - link

    Eh. Is it really offering anything unique that is hard (too hard) for an average person to bodge together on their own from off the shelf parts?

    No, it isn't. The other NUCs so far have been something you couldn't just buy the components for and assemble with no skill in perhaps an hour.
  • mode_13h - Monday, August 9, 2021 - link

    > Is it really offering anything unique that is hard (too hard) for
    > an average person to bodge together on their own from off the shelf parts?

    Please show me where I can find a Tiger Lake-H CPU and motherboard, off-the-shelf. You can't because it's BGA-only.

    > The other NUCs so far have been something you couldn't just buy the components
    > for and assemble with no skill in perhaps an hour.

    Because (like this!) they use laptop parts in a (compact) desktop enclosure.

    In this case, the only real exception is the GPU. And the fact that it's on a regular graphics card is a feature, since that makes it upgradable.
  • defaultluser - Thursday, July 29, 2021 - link

    Yeah, they even phoned-in the case design - it's exactly the same look as a Cougar QBX.

    https://www.newegg.com/p/N82E16811553020?quicklink...
  • powerarmour - Thursday, July 29, 2021 - link

    Exactly, I'm struggling to see any genuine innovation here, at least it was fun seeing what they could cram into 1.2L, now they might as well rebrand Alienware boxes and call it a day.

    Apple will have M2 ready soon, and here we have another generic 5L bread bin with a 650W PSU.
  • Spunjji - Friday, July 30, 2021 - link

    Oh neat - a new case to look at next time I do an SFF build. Thanks!
  • beginner99 - Thursday, July 29, 2021 - link

    Fully agree. You can get smaller sff pc cases than this and put similar components in it. The NUC has been about not being able to build such a small thing yourself because it was essentially custom.
  • damianrobertjones - Friday, July 30, 2021 - link

    'Next Unit of Computing'.

    Nowhere does it state that they have to be small.
  • powerarmour - Friday, July 30, 2021 - link

    And toilets don't have to be bowl shaped either... there's a clear inference (after eight generations at least) that these things should be small and compact.
  • Wrs - Saturday, July 31, 2021 - link

    It does remove a lot of the purpose for buying it when any old SFF case can house the same components without locking you to Intel cards

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now