Conclusion

What you get in terms of motherboard features and specifications for the money has changed wildly over the last 5-10 years. Whereas a $250-$300 motherboard would yield flagship status 'back in the day,' now you're looking at something in the mid-range. The ASUS TUF Gaming Z590-Plus WIFI represents a more 'mid-level' gaming series, and it has all the bell and whistles expected of a board in its price range.

Some of the most notable features on the ASUS TUF Gaming Z590-Plus WIFI includes triple M.2 for users looking to use fast storage capability, with one of these slots offering support for the fastest PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe based drives; the other two are limited to PCIe 3.0 x4/SATA support from the chipset. ASUS also includes six SATA ports for conventional devices and storage, all with support for RAID 0, 1, 5, and 10 arrays offered by the Z590 chipset. For memory, ASUS allows users to install up to 128 GB of DDR4-5133 across four slots, which is around the standard for a model of this pedigree.

There's plenty of connectivity, which includes one USB 3.2 G2x2 Type-C on the rear panel, which is a benefit of going with Z590. Other connections include dual USB 3.2 G2 Type-A, two USB 3.2 G1 Type-A, and two USB 2.0 ports on the rear panel, with plenty of expansion support via front panel headers. ASUS also opts to use one of the better HD audio codecs for its onboard audio solution, with a Realtek ALC S1200A HD powering five 3.5 mm audio jacks, a S/PDIF optical output, and also drives a front panel audio header for users with a chassis that supports this. Networking support is also pretty standard, with an Intel AX200 Wi-Fi 6 CNVi and I225-V 2.5 GbE pairing providing improved connectivity over previous generations of Intel's desktop platforms.

Focusing on the bread and butter of any analysis, which is the performance, the TUF Gaming Z590-Plus WIFI performed credibly in our testing. Power efficiency is a strong point with good results in our power consumption testing and a respectable showing in our non-UEFI POST time testing. However, we found that this board isn't DPC latency optimized out of the box, and if that's a buying requirement, we recommend other Z590 models for this. In our computational and gaming tests, the ASUS held its own and showed its performance with credit compared to other Z590 models on test.

When it came to overclocking, the TUF Gaming Z590-Plus WIFI didn't perform in line with our other Z590 boards. Despite good levels of VDroop when we manually overclocked with our Core i9-11900K, we weren't able to achieve 5.2 GHz all-core stability in our testing. We know our testbed chip can do 5.3 GHz all-core on some of the better models, and this was a little disappointing that we could only achieve 5.1 GHz. That being said, regarding VRM thermal performance, the ASUS did perform very well against other models we've tested so far, especially for the price; we got similar VRM temperatures on the ASRock Z590 Taichi, and that has active cooling, not passive like the ASUS. This is a good win for ASUS as it shows efficiency in heat dissipation and an effective VRM design.

Final Thoughts: The $200-300 Z590 Market is Highly Competitive

When selecting a Z590 motherboard in the sub $300 bracket, there's perhaps more choice than other price points. The ASUS TUF Gaming Z590-Plus WIFI is available for $259 and has a solid feature set, and holds its own in our testing. Just above this model in the marketplace is the MSI MAG Z590 Tomahawk WIFI ($265), which for $6 includes Intel's latest Wi-Fi 6E CNVi. The rest of the specifications are similar, and if wireless networking isn't a buying requirement, ASUS does have a non-Wi-Fi variant of the TUF Gaming Z590-Plus for the lower price of $230. We feel there is much better value to be had for this version, as users could add their own Wi-Fi 6E CNVi module for around the cost of the model we've reviewed today.

 

Overall the ASUS TUF Gaming Z590-Plus WIFI offers a good package, but we feel the non-Wi-Fi model offers much better value.

Power Delivery Thermal Analysis
Comments Locked

23 Comments

View All Comments

  • Holliday75 - Tuesday, August 10, 2021 - link

    I have not used a soundcard in almost 15 years. Have not seen the point. If I want audiophile sound I'll go listen to my $3200 tower speakers.
  • MDD1963 - Wednesday, August 11, 2021 - link

    Intel's 845G chipset for the Pentium III/850 (I bought it around Christmas of the year 2000) has usable onboard sound for gaming. Have not bought a sound card since 1999 or so...
  • Qasar - Wednesday, August 11, 2021 - link

    i still use soundcards, mosty because onboard sound, doesnt have dd live or dts connect, and if it does, it isnt as good as the sb z or the sb ae-5 plus i now have. the last on board sound i used, was with the n force 2, and briefly with the a64 i had.
  • blppt - Thursday, August 12, 2021 - link

    I think the vast majority use the sound over the HDMI/DP out on the video card (then from the monitor/line out), at least in most setups i've seen.

    Then, if you want higher quality sound for your cans, people buy outboard DACs/headphone amps like the FiiOs, which are far superior to any motherboard solution anyways.
  • Leeea - Wednesday, August 11, 2021 - link

    I do

    Everyone I know does.
  • Oxford Guy - Wednesday, August 11, 2021 - link

    ‘In our overclock testing, the board’s inability to hit 5.2 GHz all-core stable with our Core i9-11900K processor was somewhat disappointing. Even with a hefty 1.45 V on the CPU VCore, it just didn’t want to play ball’

    Overclocking Rocket Lake?

    I hope you had one of those Intel freezer units the company used to demo some time ago.

    Overclocking is dead. It has zero relevance, zero practicality. Modern turbo has eliminated the point.

    Moreover, Rocket Lake’s critical flaw is its 14nm power hog process. Overclocking magnifies that.

    Finally, it’s a mistake to entice people to pump reckless amounts of voltage into expensive hardware. It’s hilarious, too, given this site’s defense of its use of JEDEC RAM speeds to hobble Zen 1 and 2 in reviews.

    Most people, you claimed, don’t open BIOS to switch on XMP. But, apparently trying to overclock Rocket Lake (with or without reckless levels of voltage) is so much more relevant.

    The amount of effort, expertise, and time involved in overclocking to obtain stability, rather than useless Cinebench scores, is vastly vastly more than what is needed to switch on a single BIOS setting (XMP).
  • Nfarce - Monday, August 16, 2021 - link

    That is one of the most ignorant things I've read here in my 20 years of being on AT. You do realize that turbo boost is rated around CORES USED right? So for example that hot 5.3 "turbo" boost on this i9 is for TWO cores not ALL EIGHT. And there are countless examples of why overclocking for ALL CORES is still relevant today. Stop spreading FUD because you don't know how to successfully overclock.
  • Oxford Guy - Thursday, August 19, 2021 - link

    The laws of physics disagree with your rant.

    As for the ad hom at the end, I’m quite sure that’s the reason — not that overclocking is dead.
  • Nfarce - Friday, August 27, 2021 - link

    So you don't refute that your "point" is without merit (or benchmarks, or any other back up proof). Keep talking and showing your ignorance. The facts and benchmarks on overclocking on ALL cores for productivity alone prove you wrong.
  • Oxford Guy - Wednesday, August 11, 2021 - link

    So... Did ‘14 nm’ appear anywhere on the first page or did 1.45 volts appear instead?

    The relevance... the priorities...

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now