Unreal Tournament 2004 Performance

UT2004 is another game that is very CPU-limited. We won't see much increase in fps with SLI enabled here, either.

Unreal Tournament 2004


Unreal Tournament 2004


You can see that without AA enabled, the numbers are all nearly the same. It's only a 7% difference between the fastest and slowest NVIDIA card that we tested at 1600x1200. Without AA, the game is so CPU-limited that it's impossible to tell a performance difference between these cards.

With AA enabled, the numbers start to spread out, but you run into the same issue with the SLI setups. The 7800 GT gets a decent 25.3% increase from the 6800 Ultra, and the Ultra in SLI mode gains about another 6 fps over the 7800 GT (a 36.9% increase).

Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic 2 Performance Power Consumption
Comments Locked

77 Comments

View All Comments

  • bob661 - Thursday, August 11, 2005 - link

    quote:

    They have, just not for BF2.


    Damn it! That's the only bench (besides UT2004) that I care about. :)
  • bob661 - Thursday, August 11, 2005 - link

    Thanks guys for the updates!!!
  • So - Thursday, August 11, 2005 - link

    For those of us who would like to get a better idea of how the 7800GT compares to the 6xxx generation of cards, might you guys consider throwing 6800GT/Ultra (non SLI, preferably) numbers on the benchmarks for comparison?
  • bob661 - Thursday, August 11, 2005 - link

    I don't if this is part of the problem, but like the others said, could you guys add in some 6800 series benchmarks so we can compare?
  • JoshVenning - Thursday, August 11, 2005 - link

    Hi all,

    Sorry guys, we're having problems with the site. The article should be up and fixed in about 15 minutes. Thanks for letting us know about the problem
  • Lonyo - Thursday, August 11, 2005 - link

    Oh, I see, it's all pages except BF2. How STUPID.
  • neogodless - Thursday, August 11, 2005 - link

    I'm sure everyone contributing comments has

    1) never made a mistake
    2) never had a computer problem
    3) enjoys being degraded
  • Staples - Thursday, August 11, 2005 - link

    First off, lots of graphs are not loading.

    Second, use some common sense. I am upgrading, not downgrading. I want to see what performance I will get over my 6800GT, not how much less I will get than the $600 GTX.
  • Anton74 - Thursday, August 11, 2005 - link

    And now, for some common sense. :]

    If you're a 6800GT owner, *and* looking to upgrade that still not-so-cheap and capable beast, you're not so much worried about the money as most people are, but you'll be very interested in performance.

    So, wouldn't you want to know if you should spend ~$450 for a more modest upgrade (compared to that 6800GT), or ~$550 for the most performance you could get without going SLI?? If the ~$100 difference is a very big deal to you, you wouldn't be looking to upgrade your 6800GT. (And yes, I know these prices fluctuate, and may each be more or less, but the point is still valid.)

    Not including its direct sibbling in the benchmarks, the GTX, now that would have been lack of common sense. Honestly.
  • Staples - Thursday, August 11, 2005 - link

    Update:

    Thanks for adding them. Without them the benches were almost worthless.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now