No 2.5” Drive Bays?

I expect innovation from Apple. The first to use SSDs on their shipping notebooks, the first to use DisplayPort yet Apple was beat to the punch by HP in bringing 2.5” drive bays to market in a desktop?

The overwhelming majority of SSDs these days are made for notebooks and thus they come in 2.5” form factors. The added space of a 3.5” chassis isn’t very useful with SSDs since the limiting factor for how much flash you can put on a drive is cost, not space.

The numbers I presented in The SSD Anthology apply to Macs as well; the fresh start test depicted in the graph below is just as applicable under OS X as it is under Vista:

While Apple won’t ship any of Intel’s X25-Ms in its machines today (for reasons that I unfortunately can’t talk about but have nothing to do with technology), there’s nothing stopping its end users from making the upgrade.

The problem is that the Mac Pro doesn’t really accommodate such an upgrade very well. There aren’t any cheap 2.5” to 3.5” adapters that will work with the Mac Pro’s drive sleds so you’re left having to construct such a thing on your own. The SATA and power interfaces are standard, so the drives will work just fine, you just need a way of securing them in the chassis.


A hanging SSD in the Mac Pro. Won't Apple please provide a 2.5" drive option?

I’d expect that Apple would be the one to do this but I guess taking care of its customers spending over $3000 on a machine isn’t really at the top of anyone’s list over there. Even the MacBook and MacBook Pro get SSD options; it’s not the fastest SSD in the world but the option is there.

Apple could have easily added a single 2.5” drive bay somewhere in the case for a SSD application/boot drive, or offer an optional 2.5” sled to replace one of the four 3.5” sleds in the system. It’s a simple change that wouldn’t take an engineer long to design; Apple could call it the iForgot.

The Downside to Innovation Improvements: Limited but Important
Comments Locked

58 Comments

View All Comments

  • jamesst - Tuesday, July 14, 2009 - link

    "The Lexar reader is FireWire 800 (woo!) and the iSight is FireWire 400; I can’t use the iSight on the new Mac Pro."

    You can still use your Firewire 400 iSight camera on the Mac Pro's Firewire 800 ports. All you need is a Firewire 400 to Firewire 800 cable. I know that Belkin makes just such a cable and I even purchased one at my local Apple Store here in Raleigh, NC.
  • joelypolly - Monday, July 13, 2009 - link

    I have actually had something similar happen to a socket I was working on. It was a matter of finding a sewing needle and moving each "pin" back to the original position.
  • HilbertSpace - Monday, July 13, 2009 - link

    It would be interesting to try swapping the 2-socket tray with a 1-socket Mac Pro, and see if it works(?) Would be cheaper to buy the 2-socket board and upgrade yourself, no?
  • MonkeyPaw - Monday, July 13, 2009 - link

    Are FB-DIMMs going to disappear from the market? While at first it doesn't sound Mac-related, original MacPro owners might soon be running out of memory upgrade options (though I doubt they've held out this long to upgrade). It wasn't cheap to start with, but it seems like it was Band-Aid technology. The IMC was the answer, but FB-DIMMs were a stop-gap until Nehalem-Xeons could arrive. Perhaps a memorial article for the technology is needed?
  • JimmiG - Monday, July 13, 2009 - link

    Ok so I get it, even the "cheap" Mac Pro uses a Xeon, not an i7... But for all intents and purposes, it's an i7 920.

    Who in their right mind would pay $2,500 for a i7 920 system with 3GB of RAM, 640GB HDD and a rebranded Geforce 9500 GT? You can build a similar PC (or hackintosh) with the same specifications for the a fraction of the price - in fact you could also bump the RAM to 6GB and throw in a 1TB drive and a 4870 1GB or 4890 if you wanted and still stay *well* below that price point, even if using quality components and case.

    The Mac Pro isn't even shiny!
  • plonk420 - Tuesday, July 14, 2009 - link

    did you read page 10?
  • MrDiSante - Thursday, July 16, 2009 - link

    Did you read his comment?
  • ltcommanderdata - Monday, July 13, 2009 - link

    Another great in depth review. Your experiences with upgrading the processors were particularly interesting although I don't think it'd be something I would try.

    I just wanted to suggest you Boot Camp the Mac Pro and run the benchmarks needed to add 2x2.26GHz Gainestown and 2x2.93GHz Gainestown results to the Anandtech Bench. It might also be interesting to get a sample of the new nVidia GTX285 Mac Edition. It would certainly address the 1GB of VRAM concerns and would be cheaper than getting the HD4870 if you need 2 dual-link DVI ports since you don't need to buy that finicky adapter. There really aught to be DVI to mini-DP adapters though for people who still want to use the 24" LED display.

    http://www.glbenchmark.com/result.jsp">http://www.glbenchmark.com/result.jsp

    Oh and for interest, there turns out to be a 3D benchmark comparing the various iPhones to other cell phones. It's called GLBenchmark and needless to say, the iPhone 3G S is a screamer. They are also detecting the iPhone 3G S GPU as a PowerVR SGX 535.
  • ddobrigk - Monday, July 13, 2009 - link

    Actually, the Nehalem-EX's octo-core possibility is a no-go for now. It is a future product and has not been launched yet.

    Also, a little bit of nitpicking, but it won't use LGA1366 like these Xeons, it'll use LGA1567, because each CPU will sport a 4-channel memory controller.

    In addition, it'll sport 4 QPI links, and its intended target are 4-way and 8-way systems, not really 2-way systems. A few rumors exist about some integrators being interested in 2-socket systems, though we're still a few months from actually seeing any LGA1567 motherboard on display, AFAIK. All we saw was an Intel Demo about it.

    Don't know if Apple intends to go with 2-socket nehalem-exs, anyway, because when Nehalem-EX really hits the market, there'll also be the 6-core westmeres, I think. In any case, we're way beyond a reasonable number of cores for the typical user. :D
  • BrianMCan - Friday, July 17, 2009 - link

    MacPro's really aren't meant for typical users ;)
    Scientific, Video/Movies, 3D, and advanced users who may do many things including the already mentioned, or many things at once. Always other things I can be doing while some video is rendering, including playing some Civ 4, or starting the next video project, researching upgrades & repairs for customers, stuff like that.

    Although I personally may wait for the 2nd gen Nehalem MacPro's before I upgrade from my first gen MacPro, other than raw processing power, it does most of what I need efficiently enough.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now