Other Wal-Mart Laptops

Wal-Mart has a reputation of driving costs down, and the $300 laptop does just that. However, we want to know what else users might need to look at once those special discount laptops are gone. We browsed through the current Wal-Mart site looking for other sub-$500 that looked reasonable.


Sticking with Wal-Mart for a few more systems, we have the Acer 15.6" AS5516-5474 for $378. The same laptop is at Frys for $340, so no Wal-Mart isn't always the lowest price around. Again, you can get an idea of just how good that $300 laptop is by comparison, since this Acer has a slower Athlon 64 TF-20 CPU (single-core, 65nm, 1.6GHz, 512KB L2) and less memory (2GB) at a higher price. Acer also uses the AMD RS690MN chipset with integrated ATI Radeon Xpress 1200 graphics - another downgrade relative to the Compaq laptop. All of the other features are essentially the same as the Compaq CQ60-419WM (160GB 5400RPM HDD, DVDRW, 802.11G) and this laptop will still be "fast enough" for typical computing tasks. Normally, this is about as cheap as it gets for a new full-size laptop, so sales are the better option if you're not in a hurry.


Here's an Intel version of the above system, with an Intel Celeron 585 processor (single-core, 65nm, 2.16GHz, 1MB L2, 667MHz FSB). Besides the change in CPU, this laptop also ships with a larger 250GB 5400RPM hard drive and 802.11N networking. It uses the Intel GL40 Express chipset with Intel GMA 4500M integrated graphics - a downgrade compared to ATI and NVIDIA integrated graphics. Battery life is listed as up to three hours. The current price of the Aspire AS5335-2238 is $448, so unless you really want an Intel processor and 802.11N networking we would look elsewhere. If you want a bigger laptop with a 1440x900 LCD, the Toshiba 17" Satellite L355-S7905 uses the same chipset/CPU combination and comes with 3GB RAM (and a 160GB hard drive, 802.11G WiFi, and lower battery life) for the same price.


All of the system so far have been single-core processors, which were all the rage until about four years ago. It's true that you can still get by with a single-core system, but if we switch to dual-core CPUs we get quite a few other upgrades in the process. The Acer 15.4" AS5536-5883 builds around the AMD Athlon 64 X2 QL-64 (dual-core, 65nm, 2.1GHz, 2x512KB L2, 3600MHz HyperTransport), which is essentially two Sempron SI-42 processors. It uses the AMD RS780MN chipset with integrated ATI Radeon HD 3200 graphics. You also get 3GB RAM, a 320GB 5400RPM hard drive, DVDRW, 802.11N, Gigabit Ethernet, a webcam, and up to three hours battery life. The operating system also receives an upgrade to Windows Vista Home Premium 32-bit, with a free upgrade to Windows 7 Premium Edition when that begins shipping. This laptop costs over 50% more ($478) than the $300 special, but it does provide quite several meaningful upgrades and it's definitely worth a look.


Our Intel dual-core offering from Wal-Mart is the Toshiba Satellite L305-S5961, which barely manages to squeak into our $500 price limit (also available at Buy.com for $480). Similar to the above AMD system, you get a few other upgrades like Windows Vista Home Premium with a free Windows 7 update. In other areas the comparison definitely favors AMD. The Intel Pentium T4200 (dual-core, 45nm, 1MB shared L2, 2.00GHz, 800MHz FSB) is a fair match for the Athlon X2 QL-64; Intel has the process technology advantage but both chips still specify 35W TDP. [Ed: Yes, I know TDP is not 100% comparable between AMD and Intel, but bear with me.] You only get 2GB RAM, the Intel GL40 Express Chipset/GMA 4500M chipset/IGP combination, a 250GB HDD, and 802.11G. Battery life isn't listed but we would guess it's somewhere between two and three hours maximum - similar to the Acer system. For the price, AMD definitely has the advantage right now in inexpensive laptops.

Index Best Buy Laptops
Comments Locked

40 Comments

View All Comments

  • snookie - Tuesday, July 28, 2009 - link

    In what alternate universe does the el cheapo Ace "compete" with the MB Air? Not the same specs, not the same OS, nowhere near the same level of quality or support. Plenty of other laptops have 8 hr battery life so that isn't it.
  • brybir - Tuesday, July 28, 2009 - link

    It competes because it can functionally do most of the same things as an Air, and has one of its primary selling points, 8 hrs of use and a small/light form factor in a package that is 1/3 the price of the air. Worth at least a look to me.

    If you are not buying the Air for battery life and size/weight then why are you spending the extra money over a similarly configured macbook?
  • RadnorHarkonnen - Tuesday, July 28, 2009 - link

    Must agree here, i wouldn't buy/recommend an Acer or brands related. emachines, packard bell and gateway are some of the few.

    I wouldn't buy HP also, but that has nothing to do with the product itself. They are ussually decent ones.
  • IlllI - Tuesday, July 28, 2009 - link

    i would not recommend those either for people who want good customer service

  • brybir - Tuesday, July 28, 2009 - link

    I would want to look at actual failure rates and rate of return for individual brands before I gave advice to anyone.

    I wouldn't want to make the mistake of making recommendations based off of personal experience when that may not be indicative of actual rates of failure within each brand.

    That said, my gateway notebook has been rock solid for three years and my gateway desktop has been more stable than my homebuilt PC. So if I were to go out and give advice I would recommend Gateway. But I don't because I have no idea whether I was just lucky with good Gateways or whether there are actual, material, difference within each brand that I can quantify so I am just not spouting unverifiable opinion.


  • KompuKare - Tuesday, July 28, 2009 - link

    Well, I have to agree about the Acer since any I've seen were all rather flimsy.

    However, quality is seldom figured in on comparisons like this or the Lenovo would have been singled out for extra praise.

    I confess that I have a Thinkpad T60 and compared to any laptop I've ever owned it just oozes durability and quality. Decent battery life too and I've only go the six-cell
  • JarredWalton - Tuesday, July 28, 2009 - link

    I modified the text slightly, but that was Acer's professed goal: a PC alternative to the Air. As for 8 hour battery life, there really aren't that many Windows laptops that provide that sort of battery life in a 13.3" chassis, and certainly not with a moderate sized battery. I've seen 95Whr batteries in smaller laptops yield 8 hours, but that's as much like the Air as the Timeline.
  • IlllI - Tuesday, July 28, 2009 - link

    Can't wait for the timeline review. Theres also going to be an 11.6in version, which i would think would be closer to $300 mark

  • Calin - Tuesday, July 28, 2009 - link

    Making a notebook (higher performance than the typical netbook) in a small enclosure brings with it a price premium, not the other way around. So, I think the 11.6in version would be more expensive than the 13.3 inch version, and possibly have lower battery life.
  • IlllI - Tuesday, July 28, 2009 - link

    i don't see why it should. if its basically the same as 13.3 version only with a smaller screen

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now