Board Features

The GIGABYTE H370N WIFI is a Mini-ITX size motherboard based on the 'H' series chipset. The H370, B360, and H310 chipsets all extend an olive branch to builders on a budget who plan to purchase Intel's locked-down processors by reducing the cost associated with getting into a Coffee Lake system. By removing the ability to overclock the CPU and RAM, it provides a more palatable base when using locked 8th generation CPUs. The board supports up to 32GB DDR4 RAM up to 2666 speeds, sports the latest Intel CNVi interface for wireless offering 1.73 Gbps data rate and 160 MHz wireless channels. Networking is further supplimented by dual Intel gigabit Ethernet ports. The H370N features the latest Realtek ALC1220 codecs for audio along with Chemicon audio caps. As far as storage goes, the board should give users enough options with four SATA ports as well as two M.2 ports for high-speed storage. In the end, the H370N WIFI is a handsomely appointed board for its size. The only thing it is really missing is a USB 3.1 (10 Gbps) port or two.

GIGABYTE H370N WIFI
Warranty Period 3 Years
Product Page LINK
Price $130 (Amazon) 
Size Mini-ITX
CPU Interface LGA1151
Chipset Intel H370
Memory Slots (DDR4) Two DDR4
Dual Channel
Supporting 32GB
Up to DDR4 2666
Network Connectivity / Wi-Fi 1 x Intel I219V GbE
1 x Intel I211-AT GbE
Onboard Audio Realtek ALC1220 7.1ch surround
Video Outputs 1 x HDMI (2.0)
1 x HDMI (1.4)
1 x DisplayPort (1.2)
PCIe Slots for Graphics (from CPU)  1 x PCIe 3.0
PCIe Slots for Other (from PCH) N/A
Onboard SATA 4 x RAID 0/1/5/10
Onboard SATA Express None
Onboard M.2 1 x PCIe 3.0 x4 and SATA modes
1 x PCIe 3.0 x4 
Onboard U.2 None
USB 3.1 N/A
USB 3.0 Chipset
1 x Type-C
6 x (4 back panel, 2 through headers)
USB 2.0 Chipset
2 x onboard headers
Power Connectors 1 x 24-pin ATX
1 x 8-pin CPU
Fan Headers 1 x 4-pin CPU
2 x 4-pin System
IO Panel 1 x DisplayPort
2 x HDMI
1 x USB Type-C
4 x USB Type-A
2 x SMA antenna connectors
3 x Audio jacks

We've also included an image of the block diagram showing the internal workings of the motherboard.

Test Bed

As per our testing policy, we take a high-end CPU suitable for the motherboard that was released during the socket’s initial launch and equip the system with a suitable amount of memory running at the processor maximum supported frequency. This is also typically run at JEDEC sub timings where possible. It is noted that some users are not keen on this policy, stating that sometimes the maximum supported frequency is quite low, or faster memory is available at a similar price, or that the JEDEC speeds can be prohibitive for performance. While these comments make sense, ultimately very few users apply memory profiles (either XMP or other) as they require interaction with the BIOS, and most users will fall back on JEDEC supported speeds - this includes home users as well as industry who might want to shave off a cent or two from the cost or stay within the margins set by the manufacturer. Where possible, we will extend our testing to include faster memory modules either at the same time as the review or a later date.

Readers of our motherboard review section will have noted the trend in modern motherboards to implement a form of MultiCore Enhancement / Acceleration / Turbo (read our report here) on their motherboards. This does several things, including better benchmark results at stock settings (not entirely needed if overclocking is an end-user goal) at the expense of heat and temperature. It also gives, in essence, an automatic overclock which may be against what the user wants. Our testing methodology is ‘out-of-the-box’, with the latest public BIOS installed and XMP enabled, and thus subject to the whims of this feature. It is ultimately up to the motherboard manufacturer to take this risk – and manufacturers taking risks in the setup is something they do on every product (think C-state settings, USB priority, DPC Latency/monitoring priority, overriding memory sub-timings at JEDEC). Processor speed change is part of that risk, and ultimately if no overclocking is planned, some motherboards will affect how fast that shiny new processor goes and can be an important factor in the system build.

Test Setup
Processor Intel i7 8700K (6C/12T, 3.7G, 95W)
Motherboard GIGABYTE H370N WIFI (BIOS F4)
Cooling Corsair H115i
Power Supply Corsair HX750
Memory Corsair Vengeance LPX 4x8GB DDR4 2666 CL16
Corsair Vengeance 4x4GB DDR4 3200 CL16

used in 2x 4/8GB capacity on dual Channel Platform
Memory Settings DDR4 2666 CL16-18-18-35 2T
Video Cards ASUS Strix GTX 980
Hard Drive Crucial MX300 1TB
Optical Drive TSST TS-H653G
Case Open Test Bed
Operating System Windows 10 Pro 64-bit

We use our Core i7-8700K to assist in drawing parity with the Z370 boards we have tested, but it also puts additional stress on the motherboards that have these cheaper chipsets. The boards should still all be able to run the K processors without issue, so we put them to the test.

Many thanks to...

We must thank the following companies for kindly providing hardware for our multiple test beds. Some of this hardware is not in this testbed specifically but is used in other testing.

Thank you to ASUS for providing us with GTX 980 Strix GPUs. At the time of release, the STRIX brand from ASUS was aimed at silent running, or to use the marketing term: '0dB Silent Gaming'. This enables the card to disable the fans when the GPU is dealing with low loads well within temperature specifications. These cards equip the GTX 980 silicon with ASUS' Direct CU II cooler and 10-phase digital VRMs, aimed at high-efficiency conversion. Along with the card, ASUS bundles GPU Tweak software for overclocking and streaming assistance.

The GTX 980 uses NVIDIA's GM204 silicon die, built upon their Maxwell architecture. This die is 5.2 billion transistors for a die size of 298 mm2, built on TMSC's 28nm process. A GTX 980 uses the full GM204 core, with 2048 CUDA Cores and 64 ROPs with a 256-bit memory bus to GDDR5. The official power rating for the GTX 980 is 165W.

The ASUS GTX 980 Strix 4GB (or the full name of STRIX-GTX980-DC2OC-4GD5) runs a reasonable overclock over a reference GTX 980 card, with frequencies in the range of 1178-1279 MHz. The memory runs at stock, in this case, 7010 MHz. Video outputs include three DisplayPort connectors, one HDMI 2.0 connector, and a DVI-I.

Further Reading: AnandTech's NVIDIA GTX 980 Review

 

Thank you to Crucial for providing us with MX300 SSDs. Crucial stepped up to the plate as our benchmark list grows larger with newer benchmarks and titles, and the 1TB MX300 units are strong performers. Based on Marvell's 88SS1074 controller and using Micron's 384Gbit 32-layer 3D TLC NAND, these are 7mm high, 2.5-inch drives rated for 92K random read IOPS and 530/510 MB/s sequential read and write speeds.

The 1TB models we are using here support TCG Opal 2.0 and IEEE-1667 (eDrive) encryption and have a 360TB rated endurance with a three-year warranty.

Further Reading: AnandTech's Crucial MX300 (750 GB) Review

 

Thank you to Corsair for providing us with Vengeance LPX DDR4 Memory, HX750 Power Supply, and H115i CPU Cooler

Corsair kindly sent a 4x8GB DDR4 2666 set of their Vengeance LPX low profile, high-performance memory for our stock testing. The heatsink is made of pure aluminum to help remove heat from the sticks and has an eight-layer PCB. The heatsink is a low profile design to help fit in spaces where there may not be room for a tall heat spreader; think a SFF case or using a large heatsink. Timings on this specific set come in at 16-18-18-35. The Vengeance LPX line supports XMP 2.0 profiles for easily setting the speed and timings. It also comes with a limited lifetime warranty. 

Powering the test system is Corsair's HX750 Power Supply. This HX750 is a dual mode unit able to switch from a single 12V rail (62.5A/750W) to a five rail CPU (40A max ea.) and is also fully modular. It has a typical selection of connectors, including dual EPS 4+4 pin four PCIe connectors and a whopping 16 SATA power leads, as well as four 4-pin Molex connectors.

The 135mm fluid dynamic bearing fan remains off until it is 40% loaded offering complete silence in light workloads. The HX750 comes with a ten-year warranty. 

In order to cool these CPUs, Corsair sent over its latest and largest AIO in the H115i. This closed-loop system uses a 280mm radiator with 2x140mm SP140L PWM controlled fans. The pump/block combination mounts to all modern CPU sockets. Users are also able to integrate this cooler into the Corsair link software via USB for more control and options. 

BIOS and Software Benchmark Overview
Comments Locked

23 Comments

View All Comments

  • Incolumis - Thursday, June 21, 2018 - link

    Why can't manufacturers completely switch to USB Type C, and discard all the old and bulky USB connections? I will not buy a new mobo and case until this happens. To me USB Type C is the dream-connector, i'd use it for video, networking, and peripherals.
  • keebs63 - Thursday, June 21, 2018 - link

    because very few products actually use USB C connectors.... I want a PC, not a Macbook, I'm not going to use a freaking dongle for my mouse, keyboard, and external HDDs.
  • Incolumis - Thursday, June 21, 2018 - link

    And if the mobo included 4 USB Type C ports? and the case 2?
  • Galcobar - Thursday, June 21, 2018 - link

    For most people that would be four or five Type C ports too many, given the dearth of devices which use the connector. It's not as if Type C conveys any capabilities the other connector formats do not, other than being orientation-neutral.
  • LauRoman - Thursday, June 21, 2018 - link

    if all/most would be tb3 also, then maybe, but when is that gonna happen considering the limited pcie lanes, and the fact that in lot of cases even m.2 slots share the connection with a sata port or two.
    Even if bandwith becomes available, do you really trust usbc to hold someting like a usb stick or a wireless dongle and stuff?
  • dromoxen - Saturday, June 23, 2018 - link

    Tb3 conveys a significan charge , I choose between two mobos almost exactly the same (minus some bling) one with TB3 +£40 .. way too much premium on a midpriced mobo.
  • close - Tuesday, June 26, 2018 - link

    @Incolumis: Thinking before commenting is both easier and cheaper but you still didn't. Now imagine removing all USB Type A ports ;).

    They won't switch any time soon because motherboard manufacturers and basically every single other person in the world literally don't care what you [one customer] want. They are designing a product that will appeal a wider market. And most people do not have ANY Type C to Type C cables.

    But you want someone to market a mother board that gives you what you want AND removes what other people want. So hold in there, I'm sure in 5 years you'll be able to but a new motherboard.
  • MadAd - Saturday, June 23, 2018 - link

    which is exactly why we are in the mess we are, nobody has it so nobody wants it so nobody has it because nobody...

    So how do you propose we move on? Peripherals tend to be multi generational devices (for me at least) so the mobos will have to change first, hopefully sooner rather than later.

    The more holes for C devices there are the more people will adopt them, and yes to bridge the multi generation thing we will use dongles, or a hub, (USB hubs are quite inexpensive for your legacy pre-C devices) to get from here to there.

    Stop being a luddite, its the progress we need.
  • EnzoFX - Monday, June 25, 2018 - link

    We need COURAGE.

    -just thought it was an easy joke to make. Kind of indifferent myself.
  • EnzoFX - Monday, June 25, 2018 - link

    Actually, maybe someone like Asus can pull this off. They make the boards, don't they make peripherals now too? And now cases? They can easily push the high end by offering everything in USB-C for those nice premiums. Then it can trickle down and other manufacturers will have to catch up.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now