The Test

This time around, we've used the same configuration we did in our previous workstation article, only we've added a PCI Express system to allow for the FireGL V5000. Unfortunately, we have not yet been able to get our hands on a DP PCI Express based system, so we were forced to go with a single FX-53 in place of the two Opteron 250 setup. We were not able to retest all the cards in a single processor configuration due to time constraints, but we did retest the ATI FireGL X3-256 with the latest driver in a single processor configuration.

Fortunately, most of the benchmarks we run cope well without the second processor. We left out obviously skewed tests like the 3DStudio rendering score from the SPECapc benchmark. When focusing on graphics performance tests we did a good job of targeting applications and tests that were impacted by only the GPU.

Performance Test Configuration
Processor(s):

2 x AMD Opteron 250
AMD Opteron 150
AMD Opteron FX-53

RAM:

4 x 512MB OCZ PC3200 EL ECC Registered (2 per CPU)
2x 1024MB Kingston PC 3200 ECC Registered
2x 1024MB OCZ PC3200 EB Platinum Edition

Hard Drive(s): Seagate 120GB 7200RPM IDE (8MB Buffer)
Motherboard & IDE Bus Master Drivers: AMD 8131 APIC Driver
NVIDIA nForce 5.10
NVIDIA nForce 6.10
Video Card(s): ATI FireGL V5000
3Dlabs Wildcat Realizm 200
ATI FireGL X3-256
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4000
HIS Radeon X800 XT Platinum Edition IceQ II
Prolink GeForce 6800 Ultra Golden Limited
Video Drivers: 3Dlabs 4.04.0608 Driver
ATI FireGL 8.083 Driver
NVIDIA Quadro 70.41 (Beta)
NVIDIA ForceWare 67.03 (6800U)
ATI Catalyst 4.12 (X 800)
Operating System(s): Windows XP Professional SP2
Motherboards: IWill DK8N v1.0 (AMD-81xx + NVIDIA nForce 3)
DFI LANParty UT nF4 Ultra-D (for PCI Express boards)
Power Supply: 600W OCZ Powerstream PSU


The Kingston RAM was used in the single processor Opteron setup, and the 1024MB sticks of OCZ EB were used in the DFI nF4 Ultra board. The Kingston RAM ran with ECC disabled at 3:3:3:10, while the OCZ memory ran with 2.5:3:3:10 timings.

FireGL V5000 Configuration SPECviewperf 8.0.1 Performance
Comments Locked

9 Comments

View All Comments

  • nadirshakur - Saturday, February 26, 2005 - link

    please please please someone tell me what the hell is that thing in the middle, it looks like s-video but has three pins instead of the usual four on s-video i have the card and trying to connect it to my computer, someone please help, thanks!
  • nadirshakur - Saturday, February 26, 2005 - link

  • nadirshakur - Saturday, February 26, 2005 - link

  • Draven31 - Wednesday, February 2, 2005 - link

    But, it won't fix the occasional OpenGL errors you'll get by risking putting an ATI card in your workstation. No thanks.
  • Shadowmage - Tuesday, February 1, 2005 - link

    Damn, that's pretty bad. nVidia's going with a mere THREE vertex shader card?

    Yeah, I didn't mean to demean your review; I just think that getting $500 performance with a $200 card is rather amusing. That's even better than getting $550 performance (X850XT PE) out of a $400 card (X800 Pro VIVO)!

    And yeah, there are some driver hacks that let you install the workstation drivers on an UNMODIFIED consumer card.
  • DerekWilson - Tuesday, February 1, 2005 - link

    Shadowmage ...

    There are a few other factors that go into it, but the silion they've stuck on there is the same as the x700.

    The differences are the fact that the X700 lacks the 2 Silicon Image TMDS transmitters for 2x dual-link dvi, the stereo connector, has a different bios, and also uses different drivers. Build quality is also generally better with pro boards, and cap/resistor/pcb layouts are slightly different in some cases.

    The reason we focused on the hardware rather than on the consumer part from which it is derived is that we are going to take a look at NVIDIA's 3 vertex 8 pixel workstatoin design shortly. We would rather see NVIDIA go with a 6 vertex 8 pixel design for their workstation as well, but this would have meant deviating from their consumer desing (6600). It just so happened that ATI was lucky and their consumer part fit what we wanted to see in a midrange workstation.

    We want to encourage NVIDIA and ATI to look at their workstation parts as requiring different silicon. Maybe eventually they will actually start doing things the right way with respect to the end user. Of course, maybe I poured that message on a little thick at the beginning, but we feel it's very important.

    By the way, there was actually a guide to modding r3xx cards to their respective fgl cards on adrian's rojak pot in january. We haven't seen documentation on modding r4xx based cards into the fgl v series. It's interesting to note that it's not enough to simply flash the bios and install the drivers -- ati makes it more difficult than that.

    Derek Wilson
  • Shadowmage - Tuesday, February 1, 2005 - link

    LOL

    This is just the X700 with a different driver! :D
  • phaxmohdem - Tuesday, February 1, 2005 - link

    LOL I just found the pricing info. My bad. Great job Anand.

    And BTW

    1st and 2nd Post's bitches!!! (since that seems to be the staple of bragging rights these days for whatever reason.)
  • phaxmohdem - Tuesday, February 1, 2005 - link

    Crap! A story thats been up for nearly 24 hours with no comment love.....

    Fear not I have not forsaken thee!!

    I wish I could find pricing information on this card. Looks to be perfect for my needs dabling in 3D design.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now