The Test

The benchmarks we conducted on the Rage 128 Pro for this review were limited to two CPUs however you will see a more comprehensive test of the Rage 128 Pro and competing graphics adapters in an upcoming fall video comparison guide on AnandTech.  This is by no means a comprehensive benchmark comparison.

image002.gif (17042 bytes)

Without the CPU as a limit and at a comfortably low resolution all of the cards performed respectably well.   The Rage 128 Pro did happen to fall behind to the regularly clocked TNT2 which is its closest competitor.  The difference between the two was not too large.

image004.gif (14865 bytes)

As the resolution increases so does the gap between the Rage 128 Pro and the TNT2.  Once again the performance gap between the two isn't huge and the 32-bit color performance of the Rage 128 Pro is greater than that of the TNT2.

image006.gif (16430 bytes)

While the Rage 128 Pro does come in last once again it isn't too far behind even at 1024 x 768.  With frame rates above 30 fps in both 16 and 32 bit color the Rage 128 Pro isn't a poorly performing chip, but it is far from an excellent performing chip. 

Test Setup OpenGL - Pentium III 450
Comments Locked

0 Comments

View All Comments

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now