Dell XPS 13 (Q1 2013) Ultrabook Review: What a Difference 1080p Makesby Dustin Sklavos on March 21, 2013 5:00 AM EST
Re-introducing the Dell XPS 13
Around this time last year, we had a chance to take a look at Dell's first ultrabook, the XPS 13. This was an ultrabook I was for the most part fond of, but one that was clearly suffering from being first generation ultrabook hardware. Ultra low-voltage Sandy Bridge chips were perfectly serviceable, but they could still generate a tremendous amount of heat in a chassis the size of the XPS 13. That meant noise and heat were both serious issues. Compounding that was a routine, run-of-the-mill, utterly dismal 1366x768 TN panel display.
Dell gave me the opportunity to retest the XPS 13, though, specifically the current generation model. I was looking forward to the 1080p display, optimistic about Ivy Bridge, and utterly skeptical about the rest of the chassis. Don't get me wrong, the XPS 13 is a beautiful ultrabook and I appreciate that Dell went their own way with the design rather than producing another silver sliver, but there are what I consider to be flaws in the design that needed to be addressed. Hopefully they will be in the future, but in the meantime a lot has apparently happened under the hood.
|Dell XPS 13 (Q1 2013) Specifications|
Intel Core i5-3337U
(2x1.8GHz + HTT, Turbo to 2.7GHz, 22nm, 3MB L3, 17W)
|Memory||2x4GB integrated DDR3L-1600|
Intel HD 4000 Graphics
(16 EUs, up to 1.1GHz)
13.3" LED Glossy 16:9 1080p IPS
|Hard Drive(s)||256GB Samsung mSATA PM830 6Gbps SSD|
Intel Centrino Advanced-N 6235 802.11a/b/g/n
Realtek ALC275 HD Audio
Single combination mic/headphone jack
|Battery||6-Cell, 11.1V, 47Wh (integrated)|
Battery test button
Mic/headphone combo jack
|Operating System||Windows 8 64-bit|
12.4" x 0.24-0.71" x 8.1" (WxHxD)
316mm x 6-18mm x 205mm
Ambient light sensor
1080p IPS display
Starts at $999
As configured: $1,399
In the intervening period between the first XPS 13 review and this one, a couple of things have been changed, but most updates have been fairly incremental. For my thoughts on the chassis design itself, you'll want to check my prior review, as for better and worse, absolutely nothing has changed there. If you were part of the way sold on the XPS 13 before, though, the refinement that's gone on under the hood may yet change your mind.
Footprint compared to the 11.6" Acer Aspire V5-171.
Dell advertises the XPS 13 as being a 13.3" notebook that has a similar footprint to an 11.6" one. "Similar" is a nice way of saying "we're fudging the numbers," though; comparison reveals that the XPS 13's footprint, while svelte for a 13.3" notebook, is more in line with a 12.1" chassis. That's still excellent, though, as it means more desktop real estate (even before getting to the panel quality) in a smaller area.
As far as the CPU goes, the jump from Sandy Bridge to Ivy for ultrabooks has been a phenomenally positive one. The more hands on time I get with it, the more I'm convinced that the all-star mobile CPU for this generation of notebooks is the Intel Core i5 ULV. ULV i3 is tremendously crippled by the lack of turbo core, while ULV i7 offers virtually nothing but an extra 1MB of L3 cache and slightly higher clocks; the i5-3337U here is essentially the sweet spot. The nominal clock of 1.8GHz and turbo core of 2.5GHz on both cores and 2.7GHz on a single makes the CPU a very capable performer, and the HD 4000 graphics (with a top turbo of 1.1GHz) have proven to be largely acceptable for casual gaming.
In the meantime, Dell bumped up the RAM to 8GB, bumped the RAM speed up to 1.6GHz, and then opted for DDR3L instead of standard voltage DDR3. The wireless card has gotten an incremental update to the Centrino 6235, and the single USB 2.0 port has been replaced by a 3.0 port. Still missing is an integrated card reader. The Samsung mSATA PM830 was an excellent SSD before, so there's no real reason to replace it.
The biggest upgrade to the XPS 13 is the 1080p display, which I'm fairly convinced is either an IPS panel or Samsung's SuperPLS; it exhibits none of the viewing angle anomalies of *VA, and it doesn't wash out the way TN does. Meanwhile Dell's store page for the XPS 13 remains fairly mum about the panel type itself outside of espousing how fantastic it is, which is actually strange given that consumer awareness of IPS and alternate panels is increasing.
As a sidenote, I was able to actually remove the bottom casing of this XPS 13. To get inside the XPS 13, you'll need a T-5 Torx screwdriver. It should surprise no one that the RAM is soldered to the board; there's also a black sticker layer that sits between the mSATA SSD and the inside of the bottom panel. It's good to know that you can replace the mSATA drive and wireless card, though, should you need to/desire to.
Post Your CommentPlease log in or sign up to comment.
View All Comments
edwpang - Thursday, March 21, 2013 - linkIs there Win8 Sp1? or it's called WinBlue?
Dustin Sklavos - Thursday, March 21, 2013 - linkI told myself I'd fix that in the chart.
And then totally didn't do it.
Well it's fixed now!
jeffkro - Monday, March 25, 2013 - linkIsn't winblue "barf" a new windows version. I think I heard windows wants to lesson service pack roll outs and increase the rate of windows version roll outs. Which is fine but they need to have pricing similar to OS X releases at that point.
robvas - Thursday, March 21, 2013 - linkI can't believe a big deal wasn't made about the short battery life. Dell falls almost 3 hours short of the 13" MacBook Air.
MrSpadge - Thursday, March 21, 2013 - linkYou did notice that it's a new test, where every unit will score much lower than previously, didn't you?
jeffkibuule - Thursday, March 21, 2013 - linkPeople don't seen to read anymore.
nerd1 - Thursday, March 21, 2013 - linkMy MBA13 won't last more than 5hrs.
tipoo - Thursday, March 21, 2013 - linkIt's a new far more intensive test with the screen brightness up and so on. I'd like to see the MBAs tested with the new method.
JDG1980 - Thursday, March 21, 2013 - linkSorry, but 1080p is no longer enough. I'm tired of PCs being held back by the restrictions of a television standard that dates back to 1995. After using my iPad 4 for a while, reading text on a PC looks smeared and pixelated. If Google and Samsung can manage to put a 2560x1600 panel in the $399 Nexus 10, then why on earth can't laptop vendors do it in a $1,299 ultrabook? The only excuses I've heard are that people are too stupid to find the DPI setting or that some poorly-designed apps don't respect it. So why should everyone be punished for these shortfalls?
retrospooty - Thursday, March 21, 2013 - link" So why should everyone be punished for these shortfalls?"
I like high res too, but 1080p is pretty good for a 13 inch laptop. How exactly are you being punished? If you dont like it, dont buy it.