In November 2019, the company NUVIA broke out of stealth mode. Founded by former senior Apple and Google processor architects, John Bruno, Manu Gulati and Gerard Williams III, the company came crashing out of the gate with quite considerable goals to revamp the server market with an SoC that would provide ‘A step-function increase in compute performance and power efficiency’. Today NUVIA is putting more data behind those goals.

The press release we received from NUVIA takes some time to cover some of the basics of the modern day server market, and it initially read almost like an AnandTech article, which is eerily scary. Suffice to say, NUVIA understands the current state of play of the server market, including where Intel and AMD stand with respect to each other, and how x86 offerings are squaring up against the other options on the market. As with most elements of the server market, different verticals often have different requirements, on compute, memory, IO, power, or physical constraints, as well as initial cost of hardware alongside total cost of ownership. To that end, NUVIA’s processor designs, according to the company, ‘an SoC that will deliver industry-leading performance with the highest levels of efficiency, at the same time’.

With that, NUVIA is announcing that its first generation CPU core will be called Phoenix and be built upon the ARM architecture (likely Armv9) with an architecture license. Phoenix will be part of the Orion SoC, with NUVIA stating that they are implementing ‘a complete overhaul of the CPU pipeline’. Gerard William’s designs from Apple are known to be considerably different to what we’ve seen elsewhere in the market, so we suspect that this is going to be a big part of the secret sauce behind Orion and its Phoenix cores.

NUVIA goes on to say that Phoenix is ‘a clean sheet design’, focusing on single core performance leadership and maximizing memory bandwidth and utilization. The Orion SoC will be built to focus on high utilization and sustained frequencies, without having to rely on high-turbo marketing numbers, to allow customers to make the best use of the hardware within allocated power and cooling budgets. Alongside this, NUVIA is stating that there will be hardware infrastructure built to specification ‘to support peak performance on real cloud workloads’.

NUVIA’s Numbers

The big part of the press release is NUVIA’s performance-per-watt claims. To do this, NUVIA is using Geekbench5 as a performance indicator, along with direct power measuring, of current in-market x86 and Arm offerings. NUVIA is taking smartphone and mobile based cores, such as Intel Ice Lake, Qualcomm SD865, AMD Ryzen 4700U, as well as Apple’s A12Z Vortex and A13 Lightning, as starting points. The reason for this is that NUVIA believes there is starting to become no meaningful difference between smartphone/mobile cores and server cores when extrapolated – only if you start adding in massive vector engines for specific customers does that become relevant.

According to NUVIA’s numbers, this is where the current market stands with respect to Geekbench 5. At every point, ARM’s results are more power efficient/higher performant than anything available on x86, even though at the high end Apple and Intel are almost equal on performance (for 4x the power on Intel).

NUVIA notes that power of the x86 cores can vary, from 3W to 20W per core depending on the workload, however in the sub 5W bracket, nothing from x86 can come close to the power efficiency of high-performance Arm designs. This is where Phoenix comes in.

NUVIA’s claim is that the Phoenix core is set to offer from +50% to +100% peak performance of the other cores, either for the same power as other Arm cores or for a third of the power of x86 cores. NUVIA’s wording for this graph includes the phrase ‘we have left the upper part of the curve out to fully disclose at a later date’, indicating that they likely intend for Phoenix cores to go beyond 5W per core.

At this point, NUVIA is running simulations of its core designs in-house to get these numbers. This is a standard thing for any company developing a new SoC or a new core before actually going to the fab to get it made. It also helps investors analyze where things stand.

What gives credibility to the new company’s lofty goals is the founder’s track record of their past designs. Apple’s silicon success over the last half decade has been one of the most impressive developments in the industry, and it seems NUVIA has been able to recruit top talent with the aim to reproduce such success in the datacentre market.

Some users might consider that SPEC should have been used, given its relevance to NUVIA’s initial target markets on server, and I perhaps agree. I suspect that NUVIA believed that GB5 might be more accessible to a wider audience for core-to-core comparisons.

The Future

NUVIA states with this press release that it will aim to have some of the highest performance and best efficiency CPU/SoC products in the market. The company reiterates that even if other vendors suddenly see a 20% year-over-year gain in raw performance, NUVIA still expects to be ahead of its main competitors. We shall have to wait and see what magic NUVIA has that others do not.

Update: Initially this article said that NUVIA will have new products in the next 18 months. This was a simple misreading of NUVIA's press release and the relevent sentence has been removed.

Related Reading

POST A COMMENT

49 Comments

View All Comments

  • quorm - Tuesday, August 11, 2020 - link

    Lol at that "graph". Hope they can make it real. Reply
  • Spunjji - Wednesday, August 12, 2020 - link

    I mirror this sentiment. It'll be interesting to see how the rest of the market looks when they have a product to show. Reply
  • eoerl - Tuesday, August 11, 2020 - link

    it looks to me like the focus on a single core is a little dishonest, Intel/AMD designs need to scale up to 64 cores while Apple/Qualcomm is 2-4 big cores, the presentation from Nuvia is not super clear on that front. Remove some of the design constraints and doing better it almost granted, but it needs to be presented as a sidestep then, not a complete overtake. The curves read "look, it's possible to do better, we'll be there" while conveniently hiding a couple of parameters (core transistor count being another one, which will matter for competitiveness). Any competition is good and I hope that Nuvia delivers on that, but right now it looks like there are missing parts in the argumentation Reply
  • Jaianiesh03 - Tuesday, August 11, 2020 - link

    Its an architectural leap you could say but its not that impressive. In 18 months the A15 would be out and considering the A14 lands at about 1650 in GB5 , so A15 will probably land at around 1950(20% improvement), so commendable work but apple would be right on their heels Reply
  • Jaianiesh03 - Tuesday, August 11, 2020 - link

    By the can someone clarify, the heading says 40-50 percent whereas the article says 50-100 percent lead over zen2. Because if its just 40 to 50 percent lead over zen 2 in 18 months apple has them beat already Reply
  • Wilco1 - Wednesday, August 12, 2020 - link

    How does that matter? We're talking server chips. Their main competition is next generation server chips from Marvell, Ampere, AWS etc, and maybe AMD if Zen 3 turns out to be better than expected. Reply
  • Kamen Rider Blade - Tuesday, August 11, 2020 - link

    But even then, you have to compete against IBM's OpenPOWER and POWER10 looks pretty damn good.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/POWER10

    Don't forget Cavium with it's ThunderX# line.

    Ampere eMAG line won't sit on it's laurels and will have a chip refresh at some point.
    Reply
  • anonomouse - Tuesday, August 11, 2020 - link

    Fairly sure that if you were to plop Power9 in this chart, you'd have to extend the graph a few miles to the right. Reply
  • name99 - Tuesday, August 11, 2020 - link

    POWER10 is great if you have lots of IO or need lots of throughput.
    POWER so far has been sub-optimal on most single-threaded tasks (except for certain types of code with MASSIVE memory footprints), and I don't see POWER10 changing that.

    The other ARM vendors are irrelevant at this performance level. They're tracking the ARM performance curve, so lagging Apple by about two years. Nuvia will track the Apple curve.
    Maybe they'll compete by offering more, cheaper cores (the AMD vs Intel strategy)?
    Reply
  • Spunjji - Wednesday, August 12, 2020 - link

    Not sure about the claim re: ARM being 2 years behind. For a start, the S865 curve shows ARM's standard designs are lagging Apple by less than a year in efficiency terms. They're lagging further behind in absolute-maximum performance, but then that's something the X1 cores are set to resolve. They're an unknown quantity right now, though. Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now