Microsoft Surface Pro X Gets A Refresh: SQ2 Processor And Platinum Finishby Brett Howse on October 1, 2020 9:00 AM EST
Microsoft’s Surface Pro X seems to be a very divisive device. Being the only current generation Surface product powered by an Arm-based processor, it thrusts its users directly into the world of WoA: Windows on Arm – and all of the caveats that exist there. It is not too often we see Microsoft do a mid-cycle refresh, but the Surface Pro X gets to be the exception here as well. Today Microsoft is announcing some new updates to the Surface Pro X to make it faster, and flashier.
|Microsoft Surface Pro X|
|Memory||8 / 16 GB LPDDR4x|
2800 x 1920 (267 PPI)
3:2 aspect, 10-point multitouch
|Storage||128 / 256 / 512 GB removable SSD|
Qualcomm Snapdragon X24 LTE
|I/O||2 x USB Type-C Gen 2
|Webcam||5.0 MP front camera 1080p video
10 MP rear camera autofocus 4K Video
|Battery||Up to 15 hours
60 Watt Adapter
|Dimensions||287 x 208 x 7.3 mm
11.3 x 8.2 x 0.28 inches
|Weight||774 grams / 1.7 lbs (no keyboard)|
|Starting Price (USD)||$999
$1499 for new SQ2 Processor
The big change is that Microsoft is going to be offering their new Microsoft SQ2 processor as an optional upgrade over the SQ1 found in the Surface Pro X. We’ve reached out to the company to get clarification on the changes, but have only been told so far that the new processor is an enhanced version of the Qualcomm-built SQ1, offering more CPU and GPU performance. At this point our best guess is that the SQ2 is a version of Qualcomm's 8CX Gen 2 SoC, similar to how the SQ1 was based on the original 8CX.
Under the hood of the SQ2, the GPU upgrade comes courtesy of the Adreno 690, compared to the Adreno 685 in the SQ1. We have not been told frequencies yet but the SQ1 was 3 GHz peak, so expect a number higher than that. More performance is always welcome, so we hope we can review this model to see how it fares.
The performance increases also go hand-in-hand with the news yesterday that x64 emulation coming to the Windows Insider Program in November, which likely means a rollout to full Windows 10 on Arm sometime next year. This, coupled with more programs being natively compiled for Arm, such as Teams, should help get the Surface Pro X over the hump for more people. If more of the apps you use are natively compiled, the emulation performance and battery impact will be less noticeable, so that is always going to be the goal, but Microsoft has never been able to get every developer to get on-board with major changes like this, so the x64 emulation is a big step in making the Surface Pro X more usable for more people.
Other than the new, optional CPU, the other big change is that Surface Pro X will now be available in Platinum, rather than just the matte black that it was before.
As this is just a refresh, not much else is changing. Surface Pro X still comes with LTE availability with the Qualcomm X24 LTE modem, a 13-inch PixelSense display with a 2880x1920 resolution for 267 pixels-per-inch, 8 or 16 GB of LPDDR4x RAM, and 128 / 256 / 512 GB SSD drives which are removable.
The Surface Pro X starts at $999.99 USD, with the new SQ2 powered update starting at $1499.99.
Microsoft is also announcing new accessories today, including new keyboard colors for the Surface Pro X, with Platinum, Ice Blue, and Poppy Red. There are also new Designer Compact Keyboards with Bluetooth, offering two years of battery life, and three-device support, as well as matching number pads.
Microsoft is offering a wide-range of colors on the Microsoft Modern Mobile Mouse (Quad M? Impressive) with a new sandstone color joining the mix.
If you prefer something with a bit more shape, Microsoft also is announcing the Bluetooth Ergonomic Mouse, priced at $49.99.
Finally, there is a new 4K Display Adapter from Microsoft, priced at $69.99.
Post Your CommentPlease log in or sign up to comment.
View All Comments
Drazick - Thursday, October 1, 2020 - linkCould we have the 3:2 ratio replicated in stand alone screens?
It is the perfect ration.
Give us 34" 3000 x 2000 screens!
igor velky - Thursday, October 1, 2020 - linkJust buy 32" Apple Pro Display.
Or some variant of ultrawide monitor and you will get 2*3:2 monitor in one chassis.
Calin - Friday, October 2, 2020 - linkYou can find old 1600x1200, 4:3 screens. With 1.33 width to height ratio, they're even better than the 1.5 of Surface Pro.
You could also find 16:10 displays in the domain of business displays (1920x1200 pixels).
Revv233 - Monday, October 5, 2020 - linkHell yeah. Widescreen is for tv, not PC!
Teckk - Thursday, October 1, 2020 - linkLooks good and has 2 ports, not too bad.
But ... 500 bucks extra for a processor upgrade? Is it THAT good? Hopefully you folks get to test this one.
PixyMisa - Thursday, October 1, 2020 - linkAs far as I can tell from Qualcomm's site, it's literally the same chip. So any gains will be from clock speed upgrades, and I'll be surprised if that's as much as 10%.
Teckk - Thursday, October 1, 2020 - linkThat's a steep ask for 1499. You get a lot of better performant x86 powered 2-in-1s on which you don't have to worry about software compatibility. This is still priced way too high.
Spunjji - Friday, October 2, 2020 - linkThat's the conclusion I came to as well. They appear to be playing the same game with these processors that they did with smartwatch CPUs, where they keep re-releasing the exact same slightly-out-of-date product with a new name.
$1500 for a convertible device based on an overclocked Snapdragon 855 is a joke.
domboy - Thursday, October 1, 2020 - linkMy understanding is the SQ1 is still going to be in the base model with 8GB ram 128GB drive. I suspect the higher up models with more ram and storage are probably where the SQ2 comes in play. I could be mistaken, but that would explain the $500 better as you'd be getting more that just a new SoC for that price.
Zizy - Thursday, October 1, 2020 - linkCheck MS's site. Surface Pro X starts at 1k for 8GB/128GB. The next jump up is to 8/256 for 1.3k (yes, seriously ...), then the next one is 16/256 for 1.5k and finally 16/512 for 1.8k. SQ2 is available only on 16GB and costs the same as the current SQ1 version.
So, yes, pricing IS insane, but it isn't the CPU that's the problem here.