Gaming Performance

Ashes of the Singularity

Ashes of the Singularity is a Real Time Strategy game developed by Oxide Games and Stardock Entertainment. The original AoTS was released back in March of 2016 while the standalone expansion pack, Escalation, was released in November of 2016 adding more structures, maps, and units. We use this specific benchmark as it relies on both a good GPU as well as on the CPU in order to get the most frames per second. This balance is able to better display any system differences in gaming as opposed to a more GPU heavy title where the CPU and system don't matter quite as much. We use the default "Crazy" in-game settings using the DX11 rendering path in both 1080p and 4K UHD resolutions. The benchmark is run four times and the results averaged then plugged into the graph. 

Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation - 1080p

Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation - 4K UHD

Our AOTS results here on the Z370 platform are just as close together as our results on the X299 platform. The Z370-I managed 43.1 FPS in 1080p and 32.4 FPS in 4K.

Rise of the Tomb Raider

Rise of the Tomb Raider is a third-person action-adventure game that features similar gameplay found in 2013's Tomb Raider. Players control Lara Croft through various environments, battling enemies, and completing puzzle platforming sections, while using improvised weapons and gadgets in order to progress through the story.

One of the unique aspects of this benchmark is that it’s actually the average of 3 sub-benchmarks that fly through different environments, which keeps the benchmark from being too weighted towards a GPU’s performance characteristics under any one scene.

Rise of the Tomb Raider - 1080p

Rise of the Tomb Raider - 4K UHD

Rise of the Tomb Raider results for the Z370-I Gaming in 1080p are 93.1 FPS and 36.5 FPS inin 4K. The results are in close proximity to the others we have tested so far. So far, all of these runs are within a typical run variance. 

CPU Performance: Short Form Overclocking with the i7-8700K
Comments Locked

37 Comments

View All Comments

  • Joe Shields - Tuesday, May 22, 2018 - link

    Updated.
  • 7ruthslayer - Tuesday, May 22, 2018 - link

    I have this board, and this article doesn't mention that the RGB header is an addressable 5V digital 3 pin, rather than the traditional 12V 4 pin. Trying to find compatible fans and strips is a pain in the ass.
  • imaheadcase - Tuesday, May 22, 2018 - link

    Awesome board, zero reason to get full fledged ATX boards anymore unless a specific thing in mind like PCI or multi GPU setup.
  • dromoxen - Wednesday, May 23, 2018 - link

    i wanted a mitx board but the addition of an extra pcie slot (matx) and the generally lower prices are attractive. I still ended up getting mitx asrock z370/m , no bling, 6 satas 2network slots , significantly cheaper than virtually all z370 mitx by £40. I suspect its meant to be a no-frills , possible NAS board, no TB3 , why so cheap ? vrms? segmentation?
  • 12345 - Wednesday, May 23, 2018 - link

    mATX seems to pretty much universally have poor VRM setups designed for budget buyers.

    I added an additional pci-e x4 slot to this exact board using an m.2 to x4 adapter and then a riser cable run under the motherboard. My caselabs s3 just happens to have a 3rd expansion slot so I've got a dual 10gbps ethernet card there.
  • Dug - Wednesday, May 23, 2018 - link

    I've been out of the loop, but is bandwidth or performance decreased on m.2 hard drives when both slots are populated?
  • hanselltc - Friday, May 25, 2018 - link

    I am still patiently waiting for a decent mini-ITX AM4 offering that doesn't break the bank.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now